Advancements in phylogenetic theory and methodology coupled with improvements in computational and sequencing technology facilitate study of the divergence and diversification patterns of life. I apply our current understanding to further explore the relationships and evolution of the North American snake tribe Thamnophiini, as well as to address current topics in phylogenetic and taxonomic methodology.
There are two paradigms for the phylogenetic analysis of multi-locus sequence data: one which forces all genes to share the same underlying history, and another that allows genes to follow idiosyncratic patterns of descent from ancestral alleles. The first of these approaches (concatenation) is a simplified model of the actual process of genome evolution while the second (species-tree methods) may be overly complex for histories characterized by long divergence times between cladogenesis. Rather than making an a priori determination concerning which of these phylogenetic models to apply to our data, I seek to provide a framework for choosing between concatenation and species-tree methods that treat genes as independently evolving lineages. In Chapter 2 I demonstrate that parametric bootstrapping can be used to assess the extent to which genealogical incongruence across loci can be attributed to phylogenetic estimation error, and demonstrate the application of our approach using an empirical dataset from 10 species of the Natricine snake sub-family. Since our data exhibit incongruence across loci that is clearly caused by a mixture of coalescent stochasticity and phyogenetic estimation error, we also develop an approach for choosing among species tree estimation methods that take gene trees as input and those that simultaneously estimate gene trees and species trees.
Ideally, existing taxonomy would be consistent with phylogenetic estimates derived from rigorously analyzed data using appropriate methods. In Chapter 3 I present a multi-locus molecular analysis of the relationships among nine genera in the North American snake tribe Thamnophiini in order to test the monophyly of the crayfish snakes (genus Regina) and the earth snakes (genus Virginia). Sequence data from seven genes were analyzed to assess relationships among representatives of the nine genera by performing multi-locus phylogeny and species tree estimations, and we performed constraint-based tests of monophyly of classic taxonomic designations on a gene-by-gene basis. Estimates of species trees demonstrate that both genera are paraphyletic, and this inference is supported by a concatenated tree. This finding was supported using gene tree constraint tests and Bayes factors, where we rejected the monophyly of both the crayfish snakes (genus Regina) and the earth snakes (genus Virginia).
Progress in our understanding of molecular evolution necessitates a more thorough assessment of the phylogeny of thamnophiine snakes, whose relationships have not been fully resolved, and whose previous phylogenetic estimates are based solely on mitochondrial sequence data. In Chapter 4, I present the most data and taxa robust phylogenetic estimate of Thamnophiini to date, including 50 taxa and sequence data from 8 independently sorting loci. Our findings support the taxonomic recommendations proposed in Chapter 3. Additionally, I estimated the timing of divergence among the three major lineages to have occurred during the Miocene period (~14-11MYA), with higher than expected diversification in the garter snaked during the Pliocene period (~2-6MYA). Finally, we demonstrate that prey choice is labile, and thus an unreliable character for phylogeny reconstruction.
Combined, these chapters present a thorough examination of the molecular phylogenetics of thamnophiine snakes. The novel methodological approaches may serve as a guideline for future research. Through estimating a robust phylogeny and suggesting taxonomic changes where appropriate, this work provides a foundation for phylogenetically-based studies of this group.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-05282013-060302 |
| Date | 10 June 2013 |
| Creators | McVay, John David |
| Contributors | Cronin, James, Brumfield, Robb, Austin, Christopher, Carstens, Bryan, Carney, Robert |
| Publisher | LSU |
| Source Sets | Louisiana State University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-05282013-060302/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds