Return to search

Skin Temperature Control: A Comparison of Direct Instruction, Autogenic Suggestion, Relaxation, and Biofeedback Training

The purpose of this investigation was to separate the effects, and determine the optimal and most feasible methods, of promoting skin temperature increase in a clinical prison population. There were no significant differences among the instructional sets with respect to skin temperature increase. Skin Temperature feedback significantly delayed the time of maximum temperature increase. However, the average delay of 3.5 minutes was not considered to be clinically significant. No other significant effects were evidenced from feedback training. It was suggested that the lack of differential effects among the instructional sets and feedback training may be a characteristic of the early stages of training and that significant differences might emerge if training were continued over a greater number of sessions.The question was raised as to whether skin-temperature training had taken place during the two training sessions. The subjects may have been displaying a nonspecific "relaxation response" or habituation to the experimental situation. It may take more than two sessions before significant conditioning of the skin-temperature response occurs. Recommendations for future research were specified, including an increase in the number of training sessions and the addition of new control procedures.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc332266
Date05 1900
CreatorsVasilos, James G.
ContributorsHughes, Howard, 1937-, Kennelly, Kevin J., Holloway, Harold D., Johnson, Douglas A., Black, Charles J., Jr.
PublisherNorth Texas State University
Source SetsUniversity of North Texas
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis or Dissertation
Formatv, 65 leaves, Text
RightsPublic, Vasilos, James G., Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds