The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the extent of how have recent decisions of ECJ in cases Gasser, Turner and Owusu compromised the efficiency of jurisdiction agreements under Brussels I. Regulation. The main and most important aim of European Union, as a political and economic union, is facilitation of trade among Member States. Commercial transactions, especially in international framework are heavily regulated by contracts, wherein parties tend to regulate all potential issues in order to prevent applications of national laws. Therefore in international trade, the importance of party autonomy is even more significant than, in any other branch of contractual relations. One specific expression of party autonomy is incorporation of jurisdiction agreements into contracts, whereby parties determine which national court will have jurisdiction in the case of potential dispute. These so-called prorogation agreements are at the European level, regulated by Brussels I Regulation. However the ECJ has in several recent cases prioritized other principles, such as mutual trust and avoidance of irreconcilable judgements to the prejudice of party autonomy, which has together with very literal approach in construction lead to uncertainty in efficiency of application of jurisdiction agreements. This thesis...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:298120 |
| Date | January 2011 |
| Creators | Vydrová, Jana |
| Contributors | Brodec, Jan, Dobiáš, Petr |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds