My study addresses how and why responses to the act of self-immolation often involve desensitized reactions, such as the use of puns. Self-immolation was once more respected and influential than it is today. The best example of this is Thich Quang Duc’s 1963 self-immolation protest that may have profoundly affected the Vietnam War. To understand the transition from Duc’s self-immolation to our current times, I contextualize the rhetoric involved in self-immolation throughout history, culture, religion, and media. Integral to self-immolation is its body rhetoric that prompts rhetorical discourse. This discourse involves performative rhetoric, the disputed cause of the self-immolator, the mediation of the self-immolation, and the audience response. I consider current online user responses from various online spaces that report and/or react to recent self-immolations in America. My findings indicate that self-immolation is still able to challenge American ideologies, profoundly influence audiences, and prompt critical rhetorical discourse / The rhetoric of self-immolation -- Theorizing self-immolation rhetoric -- The self-immolation situation in India and Buddhism -- The self-immolation situation in America -- The self-immolation of Daniel Shaull and Cecelia Casals. / Department of English
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:123456789/194975 |
| Date | 13 August 2011 |
| Creators | Sippie, Andrew D. |
| Contributors | Donnelly, Michael D. |
| Source Sets | Ball State University |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds