Whereas EEC merger law has always been influenced by a tradition of hospitality to industrial concentrations combined with receptivity to government regulations, US merger law evolved originally from a tradition of inhospitality to concentrations and a strong preference for competition over government regulation of performance to a sensitive approach to consumer's interests and a more tolerant stance towards mergers. Therefore, although influenced by different history and focus both sets of merger law have certain common features and objectives and seem to head towards a better coordination of their respective antitrust authorities and a lessening of U.S./E.E.C. jurisdictional conflicts over merger enforcement.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:QMM.26082 |
| Date | January 1993 |
| Creators | Voinot, Eric P. |
| Contributors | Janda, Richard (advisor) |
| Publisher | McGill University |
| Source Sets | Library and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Coverage | Master of Laws (Institute of Comparative Law.) |
| Rights | All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. |
| Relation | alephsysno: 001349728, proquestno: MM91901, Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest. |
Page generated in 0.0015 seconds