Encouraging greater implementation of conservation agriculture practices such as reduced tillage and cover crops may require better understanding of the effect of these practices on soil health. The overall objective of this study was to quantify soil health dynamics due to conservation agriculture practices and address methodological gaps in terms of measuring soil health parameters. We developed five sites across the state of Virginia; each site had replicated plots with combinations of reduced tillage versus disk tillage and wintertime cover crops versus no cover crops as experimental treatments. Soil and plant samples were collected 1-2 times per year for 3 years, and were analyzed for 30 soil health parameters. The parameters were first evaluated to determine if any consistently detected treatment differences. We then quantified the temporal dynamics of the eight most responsive soil health parameters, while considering influences of soil water content at time of tillage, cover crop biomass, and previous land management history.
Of the analyzed parameters, only 2-4 mm aggregate stability and magnesium showed high responsiveness and consistency in identifying tillage and cover crop effects. None of the parameters detected treatment differences in all sites or at all times, yet samples collected after high biomass cover crops or after tillage in wet conditions tended to show significant treatment differences for multiple indicators. The previous history of management in each site may have affected trends in aggregate stability, but did not appear to influence other indicators.
As soil aggregate stability was found to be the most important soil health parameter, our third study developed an improved method for measuring soil aggregate stability. This new method, Integrated Aggregate Stability (IAS), interprets aggregate stability using a laser diffraction machine. Overall, IAS showed higher correlation with the wet sieving method (R2 = 0.49 to 0.59) than widely used median aggregate size (d50) (R2 = 0.09 to 0.27). IAS can also quantify stability of macro- and micro-sized aggregates, which d50 cannot. When comparing between IAS and wet sieving, IAS requires considerably less time and sample amounts.
Our fourth study focused on creating an inexpensive yet accurate tool for measuring soil respiration, as microbial assessments based on respiration rates have great potential for detecting rapid changes in soil health. Using an Arduino-based infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) sensor, we developed the Soil Microbial Activity Assessment Contraption (SMAAC) for less than $150. Our results show that SMAAC provided consistent readings with a commercial IRGA unit when tested using three different configurations.
Altogether, the research presented in this dissertation identifies important soil health parameters and quantifies their temporal and between-site dynamics. Using this narrower set of indicators can help producers and practitioners save resources when conducting measurements to assess soil health effects of agricultural practices. Further, this work also provides improved measurement techniques for useful soil health parameters like aggregate stability and soil respiration. These findings and innovations should help to encourage greater adoption of agricultural management practices that build and preserve soil health. / Doctor of Philosophy / If we want to make sure that ample and safe food is available to future generations, then it is time that we produce food without damaging the soil. Many widely used soil management techniques like tillage and leaving the field bare can harm the soil and decrease productivity in the long run. One potential technique to produce food while protecting the soil and environment is conservation agriculture, which can include reduced tillage and cover cropping. Reduced tillage is a technique in which we grow food without majorly disturbing the soil, while cover crops are planted when cash crops are not in the field in order to improve or sustain the soil. Understanding the soil-related benefits of conservation agriculture practices is important to encourage farmers to adopt these practices. In this study we tested the effects on soils of reduced tillage and cover crop practices versus conventional tillage and bare soil practices, using five locations across Virginia. We also developed improved methods for measuring two informative soil parameters. We found that, when looking at all of our five sites, the stability of soil aggregates, the rate at which water enters soil, and the nutrients in surface soils were all affected by the type of management that the soils were subjected to. Reduced tillage increased stability of soil aggregates when compared with conventional till. This increased stability of aggregates indicators lower potential for surface water runoff, erosion, and flooding when we practice reduced tillage. Cover cropping also increased stability of soil aggregates, especially when the cover crops attained substantial above-ground mass. Soil nutrients (which are essential for plants to grow) were also overall higher in the surface soil layers under no-till. Since the stability of soil aggregates was found to be an important benefit of CA practices, we also perceived a need for a better method for measuring stability of these aggregates. In response, we developed a new index called Integrated Aggregate Stability (IAS). IAS was found to give similar results as established methods, but the time required to get IAS result is about 10 minutes, whereas the time required for established methods like wet sieving is around 2 days. IAS measurements are therefore both accurate and quick to perform. We also focused on developing an inexpensive tool for measuring soil respiration. Soil respiration-based measurements help us to understand the activity of microbes in the soil. These microbes are very important for soils to function. Our tool, Soil Microbial Activity Assessment Contraption (SMAAC), was very consistent with a currently used tool and shows high potential for future use. Altogether, we found that no-tillage and cover cropping can increase stability of soil aggregates even within 1-3 years of starting those practices. No-till can also increase nutrient concentrations in the top soil layer. The tools and innovations developed in this study have the potential to increase the ability of farmers to assess soil health and also encourage greater adoption of conservation agriculture practices.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/89949 |
| Date | 12 June 2019 |
| Creators | Joshi Gyawali, Ayush |
| Contributors | Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Steward, Ryan D., Thomason, Wade E., Strickland, Michael, Hodges, Steven C. |
| Publisher | Virginia Tech |
| Source Sets | Virginia Tech Theses and Dissertation |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | ETD, application/pdf |
| Rights | In Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0031 seconds