Return to search

O papel das rela??es sociais e da aten??o social durante tarefas cooperativas em Callithrix jacchus

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:37:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RafaelaCC_DISSERT.pdf: 803401 bytes, checksum: 53c69a283d13c77927ec0912b1db2bc4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-03-30 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico / Several studies on nonhuman primates show that the relationships between individuals
strongly influence the expression of cooperative behavior, both in natural environment and in
captivity settings. Recent studies suggest that cooperative breeders present outstanding
performance in tasks involving social cognition, such as cooperative tasks with experimental
apparatuses. In experimental research on this subject it is crucial to differentiate between real
cooperation (or communicative cooperation, mediated by social attention) and by-product
cooperation that results from simultaneous actions of individuals. The present study assessed,
in Callithrix jacchus, a cooperative breeder species, if social relationships and social attention
between subjects are important factors during performance in cooperative tasks. During the
experimental procedure the animals participated in three different cooperative tasks:
cooperation task, prosocial task and control task. Diverging from the literature, matrix
correlation tests revealed no significant relationship between grooming or proximity and the
execution of the tasks, suggesting that other factors such as age or hierarchy may have an
effect on the performance in cooperative tasks in this species. There was also no relationship
between the execution of the cooperative tasks and social glances, suggesting that there was
no social attention during the tasks. Moreover, there were lower rates of social glances in the
cooperative tasks as opposed to the control tasks. However, the small number of pulls in
prosocial tasks suggests that the animals distinguished between tasks that benefited only a
partner and tasks that generated benefits to themselves, choosing the latter. We conclude that,
for the tasks presented in this study, we could neither detect the role of social relationships on
the cooperative tasks nor assert that there were true cooperation and prosocial behavior / Diversos estudos com primatas n?o humanos mostram que as rela??es entre os indiv?duos t?m
forte influ?ncia sobre a express?o de comportamentos cooperativos tanto em ambiente natural
como em cativeiro. Trabalhos recentes sugerem que esp?cies com cuidado cooperativo de
infantes t?m desempenho destacado em testes que envolvem cogni??o social, como testes
cooperativos que utilizam aparatos experimentais. Nas pesquisas experimentais sobre o tema
? fundamental distinguir a coopera??o verdadeira (ou comunicativa, mediada por aten??o) da
coopera??o que ocorre como subproduto de atividades coincidentes. O presente trabalho
avaliou em Callithrix jacchus, uma esp?cie com cuidado cooperativo da prole, se as rela??es
sociais e a aten??o social entre os indiv?duos s?o importantes elementos durante a realiza??o
de tarefas cooperativas. No procedimento experimental, os animais participaram de tr?s
tarefas cooperativas diferentes: teste de coopera??o, teste de prosocialidade e controle.
Diferente do descrito na literatura, os testes de correla??o de matrizes n?o revelaram
correla??o significante entre rela??es afiliativas de cata??o e proximidade e a execu??o das
tarefas, e sugere-se que outros fatores podem influenciar a ocorr?ncia das mesmas, como a
idade ou a hierarquia. Tamb?m n?o foi encontrada rela??o entre a execu??o das tarefas
cooperativas e olhares sociais, sugerindo, inicialmente, que n?o houve aten??o social na
realiza??o dos testes. Ademais, menores taxas de olhares sociais ocorreram no teste de
coopera??o em rela??o ao controle. Entretanto, o reduzido n?mero de puxadas por indiv?duo
no teste de prosocialidade, apontou para a possibilidade dos indiv?duos terem percebido a
diferen?a entre tarefas que beneficiam somente um parceiro e tarefas que geram benef?cio
pr?prio, dando prefer?ncia ? ?ltima. Para as tarefas apresentadas neste trabalho n?o foi
poss?vel detectar a influ?ncia das rela??es sociais nas tarefas cooperativas tampouco foi
poss?vel afirmar que a coopera??o e o comportamento prosocial s?o verdadeiros

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/17327
Date30 March 2012
CreatorsCerqueira, Rafaela Cobuci
ContributorsCPF:90501420444, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6566269393468726, Miranda, Maria de F?tima Arruda de, CPF:09453997404, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4654421846443562, Resende, Briseida D?go de, CPF:15729660847, http://lattes.cnpq.br/9601221530967113, Ferreira, Renata Gon?alves
PublisherUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Psicobiologia, UFRN, BR, Estudos de Comportamento; Psicologia Fisiol?gica
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.013 seconds