Return to search

The campus carbon convalescence: creating a carbon-friendly university landscape

Master of Landscape Architecture / Department of Landscape Architecture/Regional and Community Planning / Lee R. Skabelund / Universities play a key role in the progression of society. With increased releases of carbon into the
atmosphere and the effect of carbon dioxide and related pollutants on air quality and climate, it is
critical that universities reduce their carbon footprints.
Alternative landscape architectural designs and management techniques, such as rain gardens,
constructed wetlands, restored prairies, and woodlands can be implemented to mitigate carbon
outputs. Infrastructural landscapes‐called “green infrastructure” for their ability to meet essential
human needs using natural processes ‐ sequester carbon at high rates, improve storm water runoff
quality, and reduce runoff volumes.
Establishment of native and other appropriate green space networks on university campuses can
provide rich settings for education, research, and infrastructural services while also promoting carbon
neutrality—achieving net zero carbon emissions by balancing carbon released to the atmosphere with
an equivalent amount sequestered in vegetation or offset by investing in renewable energy sources.
The large experiential landscapes associated with university campuses can operate simultaneously as
alternative storm water and carbon mitigating landscapes. They likewise have the potential to restore
critical ecological processes while reflecting many of the ecosystems associated with the eco‐region
where each university resides.
The educational aspect of universities will be enhanced through an interwoven landscape of green
infrastructure networks and pedestrian corridors that engage and inform faculty, students, staff and
visitors.
Development of green infrastructure on university campuses can significantly reduce human impacts on
the local environment. They can also increase environmental awareness and showcase responsible
stewardship of the land and recourses. These landscapes have great potential to restore native
ecosystems and/or historic landscapes habitats. In the right locations they can provide stable
environments for various regionally important plant and animal species. Green infrastructure can also
reduce short‐ and long‐term costs associated with creating, maintaining, and replacing traditional pipeto‐
pond storm water infrastructure. Increased carbon sequestered in infrastructural landscapes could
likewise be a source of additional revenue for universities through the carbon trading market (assuming
this market becomes active and remains productive in the U.S.), thus creating a return on investment in
the overall green infrastructure system for a campus.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:KSU/oai:krex.k-state.edu:2097/4119
Date January 1900
CreatorsBenedick, Jesse Glenn
PublisherKansas State University
Source SetsK-State Research Exchange
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeReport

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds