Return to search

Clinical Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome / CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND COGNITIVE INTERVIEWING STUDY OF A DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONNAIRE

Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a condition affecting wrists and hands, causing pain, tingling, and numbness. Despite the high prevalence of CTS and the existence of several diagnostic tools, there is no consensus over a diagnostic gold standard test.
Thesis Objectives: To conduct a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy of clinical scales, questionnaires and hand symptom diagrams/maps for the diagnosis of CTS in people suspected with this condition; and to do a cognitive interviewing qualitative study of the Kamath and Stothard questionnaire, a diagnostic tool for CTS, to identify and resolve potential sources of error.
Methods: In the first study, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases keywords related to diagnostic accuracy and clinical tests of CTS. In the second study, we interviewed clinicians and people diagnosed with CTS and other upper extremity conditions. We recorded, and content analyzed their opinion on comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of Kamath and Stothard questionnaire.
Results: Twenty-one articles met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review, of which nine were on the diagnostic accuracy of hand symptom diagrams and twelve assessed the diagnostic accuracy of clinical scales and questionnaires for the diagnosis of CTS. Positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to diagnose or rule in CTS ranged from 0.94 for Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire to 10.5 for CTS-6 scale, and negative LRs to rule out CTS ranged from 1.05 to 0.05 for the same diagnostic tools. In the cognitive interviewing study, we categorized the areas of uncertainty in the participants’ responses into five themes: clarity and comprehension (51%), relativeness (38%), inadequate response definition (3.75%), perspective modifiers (3.75%), and a reference point (2.5%).
Conclusions: Very few high-quality studies exist on the diagnostic accuracy of CTS-6, Kamath and Stothard questionnaire, Bland questionnaire, and Katz and Stirrat’s hand symptom diagram. By doing cognitive interviews, we identified options for potential improvement in the wording of the Kamath and Stothard questionnaire. Future studies should assess the diagnostic properties of the proposed modified questionnaire, and high-quality studies are warranted to assist in deciding on ruling in or out CTS. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc) / Carpal tunnel syndrome is a condition affecting the hands, causing feelings of burning pain, pins and needles, heaviness and/or lack of sensation. This condition is very common among people who do manual work and can make them unable to do their jobs and daily living tasks. Early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is very important in starting an appropriate plan of treatment. The best diagnostic test for carpal tunnel syndrome is still uncertain.
In the first study, we collected studies of the questionnaires and hand maps that exist for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. We then tried to summarize the information that assists clinicians in making a diagnostic decision. In the second study, we interviewed people about their opinion of a questionnaire that is used in hand clinics to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome.
We concluded that more studies with high quality are needed to confidently decide which diagnostic test is best. Also, we revised a questionnaire that is currently used, and we hope that these revisions make the questionnaire more relecant and understandable for people.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/24834
Date January 2019
CreatorsDabbagh, Armaghan
ContributorsMacDermid, Joy C., Rehabilitation Science
Source SetsMcMaster University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.0013 seconds