I have outlined some objections to soteriologies that presume that only
some are given a chance of eternal life. Such soteriologies can include
or exclude those mentally competent but lacking human evangelisation.
Fundamental to evaluating soteriologies I have looked at both what sin is
(being and doing) and what salvation consists in, as regards divine and
human interaction. On the one side I have considered God's goodness -
would such a being act unethically regarding man's eternity? On the
other hand I have looked at whether, and if so in what way, man is
required to respond - in what way or ways is chance (if at all) given.
Finally I have considered views about those who die in infancy.
Here I
have tentatively suggested my own theory which seeks to presume that
before death every human being may choose to accept of reject God, a
choice integral (I suggest) to salvation. / Department of Philosophy, Practical & Systematic Theology / M. Th. (Systematic Theology)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:unisa/oai:umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za:10500/16896 |
| Date | 11 1900 |
| Creators | Hakes, Stephen Harold |
| Contributors | Veldsman, Danie, 1959- |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Format | 1 online resource (93 leaves) |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds