Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2018-09-26T17:50:29Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2013 - Cristiano de Souza Marchesi.pdf: 1452354 bytes, checksum: ec7728b614475bb908da89c09f1ef3eb (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-26T17:50:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2013 - Cristiano de Souza Marchesi.pdf: 1452354 bytes, checksum: ec7728b614475bb908da89c09f1ef3eb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-08-14 / Despite all agricultural production leaving Brazilian soils strength of agribusiness news is that, most of the soils in the country are not classified at the appropriate level for use by the farmer, or better saying, the farms and forest, mostly not have a mapping their soils, so technically mostly producers and professionals working in these properties do not have a detailed knowledge of the types of soils that have worked. The soil classification is the basis for determining the potential use of the land, ie, guide the sustainable use of the same. For this situation, it is known that many factors corroborate the frame. Among these the human factor has great weight in this matter because, Survey and Soil Classification (LCSs) are present on curricular content for training of Agronomists, Forestry Engineers, etc.., and scholars and authorities in the field of Soil Science have signaled that the Higher Education Institutions (specifically undergraduate) come crashing in training these professionals supposedly trained and qualified to the activity of LCSs, considering that the courses that form such professionals invariably advocated among other things "solid scientific general and professional ... "what prescribes the contents of their curricular chord in the National Curriculum Guidelines. Informally today, teachers generally do mind that the problem lies in the structure of undergraduate courses regarding aspects: design of a workload of disciplines; literature indicated in ement?rios; disciplines sequence prerequisites; opportunity of additional knowledge through elective courses, etc.. Thus, sensing data bring to literature that deal with the subject, aimed this work was to analyze the conditions for teaching of LCSs course of Forestry's IFMT - Campus C?ceres through its Political-Pedagogical Project (PPP) as all the above aspects. This research is exploratory, Documentary and Quanti-qualitative nature. Included in the questionnaire data collection and content analysis for inferences. The inferences are that the references (data obtained from educators in the field of Soil Science of the five geographical regions through a questionnaire) indicate that the PPP course has limitations that may affect the teaching-learning LCSs and achieve, in this regard (themes mentioned), the professional profile designed by the course concerning "solid scientific and professional general enabling absorb and develop technology." The limitations were: inadequate sizing workload in disciplines that include LCSs and related activities; literature indicated in these ement?rio not include modern features with the potential to collaborate with a better education, sequence of disciplines inappropriate prerequisites discipline that includes these activities and, lack of opportunity for complementation of knowledge related to these themes via list of electives. Given the paucity of information in the literature that addresses on the subject, the data generated will assist both in the construction and / or reformulation of PPP courses in general as well as instigating research on the topic. / Apesar de toda produ??o agropecu?ria que saem dos solos brasileiros, pujan?a do agroneg?cio que se noticia, a maior parte dos solos do Pa?s n?o est?o classificados a n?vel adequado para utiliza??o do agricultor; ou melhor, dizendo, as propriedades agr?colas e florestais, em sua maioria, n?o possuem um mapeamento de seus solos, logo, majoritariamente produtores e profissionais tecnicamente atuantes nestas propriedades n?o possuem um conhecimento detalhado dos tipos de solos que se t?m trabalhado. A classifica??o dos solos serve de base para determina??o do potencial de uso das terras, ou seja, norteiam a utiliza??o sustent?vel das mesmas. Para esta situa??o, sabe-se que muitos fatores corroboram com o quadro. Dentre estes o fator humano tem grande peso nesta quest?o; pois, Levantamento e Classifica??o de Solos (LCSs) s?o conte?dos presentes nas matrizes curriculares para forma??o de Engenheiros Agr?nomos, Engenheiros Florestais, etc.; e, estudiosos e autoridades da ?rea de Ci?ncia do Solo t?m sinalizado que as Institui??es de Ensino Superior (especificamente cursos de gradua??o) v?m falhando na forma??o desses profissionais pressupostamente capacitados e habilitados para a atividade de LCSs; tendo em vista que, os cursos que formam tais profissionais, invariavelmente, preconizam dentre outras coisas ?s?lida forma??o cientifica e profissional geral...? daquilo que prescreve os conte?dos de suas matrizes curriculares em acorde com as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais. Informalmente na atualidade, docentes em geral cogitam que o problema est? na estrutura dos cursos de gradua??o quanto aos aspectos: dimensionamento de carga hor?ria de disciplinas; bibliografia indicada em ement?rios; sequencia de disciplinas pr?-requisitos; oportunidade de complementa??o de conhecimentos via disciplinas optativas, etc. Dessa forma, intuindo trazer dados ? literatura que versem sobre o assunto, objetivou-se com este trabalho analisar as condi??es para atividades de ensino de LCSs do curso de Engenharia Florestal do IFMT - Campus C?ceres atrav?s de seu Projeto Pol?tico-Pedag?gico (PPP) quanto aos aspectos supramencionados. A presente pesquisa ? Explorat?ria, Documental e de natureza Quanti-qualitativa. Incluiu o Question?rio na coleta dos dados e a An?lise de Conte?do para as infer?ncias. As infer?ncias s?o de que as refer?ncias (dados obtidos junto a educadores da ?rea de Ci?ncia do Solo das cinco regi?es geogr?ficas brasileiras atrav?s de question?rio) indicam que o PPP do curso apresenta limita??es que podem comprometer o ensino-aprendizado de LCSs e alcan?ar, neste quesito (tem?ticas mencionadas), o perfil profissional projetado pelo curso concernente a ?s?lida forma??o cient?fica e profissional geral que possibilite absorver e desenvolver tecnologia?. As limita??es encontradas foram: dimensionamento inadequado de carga hor?ria em disciplinas que contemplam LCSs e atividades correlatas; bibliografia indicada no ement?rio destas n?o incluem recursos modernos com potencial de colaborar com uma melhor forma??o; sequ?ncia inapropriada de disciplinas pr?-requisitos a disciplina que contempla estas atividades; e, inexist?ncia de oportunidade para complementa??o dos conhecimentos relacionados a tais tem?ticas via rol de disciplinas optativas. Dado a escassez de informa??es na literatura que trate sobre o assunto, os dados gerados poder?o auxiliar tanto na constru??o e/ou reformula??o de PPP de cursos em geral bem como instigar pesquisas sobre a tem?tica.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/2475 |
Date | 14 August 2013 |
Creators | MARCHESI, Cristiano de Souza |
Contributors | Zonta, Everaldo, Sanchez, Sandra Barros, Zonta, Everaldo, Rangel, Mary, Pereira, Marcos Gerv?sio |
Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o Agr?cola, UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Agronomia |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds