Return to search

Planning for mitigating climate change risk to metropolitan areas (USA)

In the last couple of decades, there has been increasing evidence of changes in
global climate. With urban areas identified as the primary contributors to the climate
change, there is an impetus for initiatives to persuade major contributors of greenhouse
gases to undertake policy measures for climate change mitigation. The support for such
initiatives at the international level has been mixed with many nations, including the
United States, not accepting the Kyoto protocol. In view of the evident disagreement at
the international level, initiatives promoting local communities to adopt self regulating
policies for climate change mitigation have gained importance. One such initiative is the
Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) supported by the International Council for Local
Environmental Initiatives.
This research explores the differences in the socio-economic and civic
characteristics of metropolitan areas in the contiguous United States that have committed
to CCP (as a policy measure for climate change mitigation) to those that have not. The
data in this study has been primarily collected from the census documents and government publications. The indicators are grouped into risk, stress and civic variables.
The differences amongst the metropolitan areas with CCP committed jurisdictions and
those with non-committed jurisdictions have been analyzed through statistical t-tests and
use of geographical information system (GIS). The research reveals that metropolitan
areas with a higher degree of risk are more likely to commit to climate change mitigation
policies whereas those with higher stress index are less likely to commit. The
metropolitan areas with higher civic index were also found more likely to commit to
policy measures for climate change mitigation. The results of the study are significant as
they reveal that communities that are at risk are not necessarily adding to the climate
stress and those contributing the most to the climatic stress are not committed to climate
change mitigation. The results of the study support the need to discontinue the closed
box approach and instead adopt an approach with vertical integration. Cooperation and
coordination amongst the hierarchical aggregate levels of communities, from a place to a
region, are imperative for effective implementation of climate mitigation initiatives.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1870
Date02 June 2009
CreatorsGrover, Himanshu
ContributorsBrody, Samuel B
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeBook, Thesis, Electronic Thesis, text
Formatelectronic, application/pdf, born digital

Page generated in 0.0182 seconds