Return to search

Sex differences in academic dishonesty : a sex role explanation

Previous research on academic dishonesty in colleges and universities has consistently shown unacceptable rates of cheating, yet inconsistent reports of sex differences in cheating. Sex differences in cheating were studied in relation to sex role orientation and attitudes towards cheating, and in light of a distinction between two types of cheating; cheating to benefit oneself and cheating to benefit another. 256 undergraduate students completed anonymous surveys to tap their sex role orientation, attitudes towards cheating, and reported frequency of cheating. Although females reported having more disapproving attitudes towards cheating than males, they reported engaging in cheating just as much as males. Sex role orientation was not directly related to cheating, but female-associated characteristics were related to attitudes towards cheating, which, in turn, were strongly related to cheating behavior. It was also found that participants reported engaging in more cheating to benefit another person than cheating to benefit themselves. / Department of Psychological Science

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:handle/185509
Date January 1996
CreatorsKlimek, Jennifer L.
ContributorsBall State University. Dept. of Psychological Science., Whitley, Bernard E.
Source SetsBall State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Format52 leaves ; 28 cm.
SourceVirtual Press
Coveragen-us---

Page generated in 0.002 seconds