Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
FabioBS.pdf: 1653243 bytes, checksum: dca8eff5a43688abcaf59253190aef82 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008-03-14 / The work presented here is about aspects of the constitutional extension in which is the public civil action with the objective of verifying its aptitute in tutelaging subjective situations derived from fundamental rights, especially right to health assistance. Thus, it offers a clear analysis of the practical functioning of most aspects of the public civil action (lawsuit), with philosophical foundation and necessary doctrinaire to your comphehension. How it once was
(history), how it could be (reform suggestion), how it is (current interpretation of the law) and how it should be (critic analysis of the microsystem of collective tutelaging of rights, its perspectives, as well as the efficacy of the public cilvil action about accomplishment of the right to health as supraindividual right). The objective is to analyse the main version of the theme (for instance: the impacts caused to the dissociation of the Procurations theory), so that it can be extracted the philosophy and the general theory, of the public civil action and collective tutelaging in general, pragmatically applicable to study purposes. With this theorical fountain, the reader will be in a more solid position, not only being able to
understand the subtilities of the public civil action, but mainly being able to recognize its faults and present solid reform proposals and improvement. It is know that the Juridical
Power (Procuration) does not allow any more inactivity about negating accession to health in its collective dimension (lato sensu: spread, collective stricto sensu and homogeneous
individuals), being imputed to it novel usage that consolidates in the assumption of the role instrument set aside to be used by all with organized instancy of solution to collective
conflicts in large sense. This happens, overall, because of the current justice politization, understood as juridical activism, connected to the struggle between the groups defending their
interests and the acceptance of the constitution about solidifying the public politics of quality health / O presente trabalho aborda aspectos da dimens?o constitucional em que se situa a a??o civil p?blica, com vistas a verificar a sua aptid?o para tutela de situa??es subjetivas derivadas de direitos fundamentais, especialmente o direito ? sa?de. Deste modo, procura oferecer uma an?lise direta do funcionamento pr?tico de quase todos os aspectos da a??o civil p?blica, com a fundamenta??o filos?fica e doutrin?ria necess?ria ? sua compreens?o. Como foi (hist?ria), como poderia ser (sugest?es de reforma), como ele ? (atual interpreta??o da lei) e como deveria ser (an?lise cr?tica do microssistema de tutela coletiva de direitos, suas perspectivas, bem como a efic?cia da a??o civil p?blica no que se refere ? concretiza??o do direito ? sa?de enquanto direito supraindividual). O objetivo ? analisar as principais variantes do tema (por exemplo: os impactos causados ? teoria da separa??o dos poderes) e, assim, poder extrair a
filosofia e a teoria geral da a??o civil p?blica e da tutela coletiva em geral, dogmaticamente aplic?vel ao objeto de estudo. De posse desse manancial te?rico, o leitor estar? em uma posi??o mais s?lida, n?o somente para compreender as sutilezas da a??o civil p?blica mas, principalmente, para poder reconhecer as suas falhas e apresentar concretas propostas de reforma e aprimoramento. Constatou-se que ao Poder Judici?rio n?o se admite mais a inatividade diante da nega??o de acesso ? sa?de em sua dimens?o coletiva (lato sensu:
difusos, coletivos stricto sensu e individuais homog?neos), sendo-lhe atribu?da novel ocupa??o que se consubstancia na assun??o do papel de ?rg?o colocado ? disposi??o de todos
como inst?ncia organizada de solu??o de conflitos coletivos em sentido amplo. Isso ocorre, sobretudo, em raz?o da presente politiza??o da Justi?a, compreendida, ent?o, como ativismo judicial, conectado com a luta das partes em defesa de seus interesses e o acatamento ? Constitui??o no que se refere ? concretiza??o das pol?ticas p?blicas de sa?de com qualidade / 2018-03-01
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/13882 |
| Date | 14 March 2008 |
| Creators | Santos, F?bio Bezerra dos |
| Contributors | CPF:93693320410, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5120480321290362, Tavares, Andr? Ramos, CPF:00000000054, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5047178759815100, Oliveira, Gleydson Kleber Lopes de, CPF:76993604119, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7731891270111334, Fran?a, Vladimir da Rocha |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, UFRN, BR, Constitui??o e Garantias de Direitos |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds