Thesis ( Masters Diploma(Civil Engineering))--Cape Technikon, Cape Town, 1991 / The incidence of disputes has long frustrated effective management and
completion of Construction Contracts. Very little material is available on the
causes of disputes and how the respective General Conditions of Contract used
in this country handle circumstances relating to these areas of dispute.
Causes of dispute can be divided into two categories, namely Primary Causes
and Secondary Causes. The Primary Causes are Time, Cost and Quality and the
Secondary Causes are Risk. Variations and Alterations, Delays, Claims, Adverse
Physical Conditions, Extensions of Time and Payment. All the secondary
causes of dispute are risk related and a consideration of risk is therefore of
utmost importance with regard to avoidance of disputes.
To avoid disputes. risk has to be fairly allocated amongst the parties involved
in the Contract. Before this can be done, however, risk first has to be
identified and an attempt has to be made to reduce it. For a long time General
Conditions of Contract have been used in this country which have been closely
allied to British General Conditions. The General Conditions of Contract (1982)
(Blue Book) is very closely allied to the I.CR General Conditions of Contract (4th
edition). The latter contract was revised in 1979 and was generally
considered to be more favourable toward the Contractor. It has become
known as the LCE. General COnditions of Contract (5th edition). Both the
General Conditions of Contract (1982) and the ESKOM General Conditions of
Contract have recently been reVised, and on comparison of the clauses relating
specifically to the major causes of disputes mentioned preViously, were found
to be more biased in favour of the Employer and more closely allied to the
C.S.R.A. General Conditions of Contract 1986, also widely used in South Africa
The major reason for having drawn this conclusion is that in the case of GC C
'90 and ESKOM '90, all claims have to be made in accordance with a general
claims clause which involves a procedure which subjects the Contractor to
unfair requirements and allocates risk unfairly on him. The General
Conditions of Contract 1990 do, however, represent improvements in certain
respects, namely with respect to clauses relating to Care of Works, Excepted
Risks, Valuation of Variations, Monthly Payments, Time of Payments and
Correction or Withholding of Certificates.
No set of General Conditions can provide a completely equitable situation and
each has its pros and cons. This thesis should provide an easy reference as to
which are the major causes of disputes and as to how the respective General
Conditions of Contract in this country handle the circumstances relating to
these areas of dispute.
It will also put forward recommendations on how disputes can be avoided and
how certain clauses of the relevant documents can be improved.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:cput/oai:localhost:20.500.11838/1026 |
| Date | January 1991 |
| Creators | Howell, David Evan |
| Publisher | Cape Technikon |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/ |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds