Return to search

Consumer protection in Swaziland : a comparative analysis of the law in South Africa and the United Kingdom.

Consumer protection has become an important issue in many spheres of trade. This fact is borne
out by the many consumer protection laws introduced in many countries globally. However,
despite these developments Swaziland is lagging behind. Obviously, this state of affairs has left
consumers in Swaziland in a totally vulnerable position. Consumers are often exploited in two
material respects. They are either subjected to unfair contract terms in the provision of services,
or supplied with defective products having the potential of causing serious bodily harm. In
protecting consumers the common law has been judicially developed over many centuries to
curb these unfair trading practices. The doctrine of freedom of contract has been the driving
force in regulating the relations between consumers and suppliers. The import of this doctrine is
the unyielding recognition of an individual’s autonomy in the conclusion of consumer
transactions. The underlying percepts of this doctrine are privity of contract, which only
recognises obligations between contracting parties, and pacta sunt servanda which requires
contractual undertakings to be recognised. The operation of contractual freedom in concluding
agreements often leads to unfair results against consumers because suppliers usually impose
unfair terms as a result of their stronger bargaining power over consumers. In short, problems
faced by consumers were twofold; first, they have to battle the issue of potentially harmful
goods, and secondly, their economically weak bargaining position is exploited by suppliers
through the use of unfair contract terms. Many countries, including the United Kingdom and
South Africa, addressed these two consumer issues decisively through statutory reform aimed at
protecting consumers against potentially harmful products and unfair contract terms. Swaziland
requires statutory reformative measures that will ensure a shift from the current consumer
framework regulated by outmoded common law principles towards a modern framework that
will comply with international standards. / Thesis (LL.M)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2012.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/9852
Date31 October 2013
CreatorsDlamini, Eugene Majahemphini.
ContributorsSubramnien, Darren Cavell.
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
Languageen_ZA
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.002 seconds