LL.M. (International Commercial Law) / “It is in this very context of employment relationships which have a cross-border dimension that conflict of law between individual legislative systems in the area of employment law raise complex questions of law. One of the consequences of this is that they often present the courts … which are called upon to determine the law applicable to an employment contract with considerable problems. Alongside the customary difficulties associated with interpreting the employment contract comes the uncertainty as to what the best approach is to determining the applicable law. These difficulties in judicial practice are on the increase as it becomes more common for workers to be posted, more EU citizens avail themselves of the freedom of movement for workers and more undertakings enter into relationships with firms overseas or operate places of business in other countries. The – temporary or indefinite – posting of large numbers of employees has become an important aspect of international economic relations, not only within the European internal market but, more generally, throughout the world. It is for that very reason that there is an urgent need for conflict of law rules which offer the contracting parties foreseeable solutions to the numerous problems that affect employment relationships...”Like Advocate General Trstenjak, South African writers are not ignorant of the complications that international contracts of employment bring. As correctly pointed out by Calitz, globalisation has resulted in many South African employees increasingly working for South African employers outside of South Africa and the determination of any disputes that may arise in these unique employment relationships requires the application of conflict of laws. This is problematic and the present author submits that there is a lacuna in South African private international law in respect of employment contracts involving a foreign element. A number of factors have contributed to this gap in South African private international law, namely the infrequency with which judges in South African courts have been called upon to determine such issues.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:uj/uj:11167 |
| Date | 26 May 2014 |
| Creators | Massyn, Clive |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Rights | University of Johannesburg |
Page generated in 0.1748 seconds