Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Direito, 2011. / Submitted by Shayane Marques Zica (marquacizh@uol.com.br) on 2011-09-14T19:13:09Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2011_StefanoCunhaAraujo.pdf: 513591 bytes, checksum: ccac824e1c3d7e7afe101112399aea36 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Jaqueline Ferreira de Souza(jaquefs.braz@gmail.com) on 2011-10-03T13:03:47Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
2011_StefanoCunhaAraujo.pdf: 513591 bytes, checksum: ccac824e1c3d7e7afe101112399aea36 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2011-10-03T13:03:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2011_StefanoCunhaAraujo.pdf: 513591 bytes, checksum: ccac824e1c3d7e7afe101112399aea36 (MD5) / Analisa-se a tese de mutação constitucional do art. 52, X, da Constituição Federal e a transposição dos efeitos da decisão de inconstitucionalidade do controle concentrado para o controle difuso. Rejeita-se a referida tese por se reconhecer no controle difuso um legítimo instrumento de democratização do controle de constitucionalidade. Analisa-se, ainda, inovações processuais constitucionais que visam à diminuição da demanda judicial no Supremo Tribunal Federal e que ampliam os poderes deste órgão por meio de um esquema de aproveitamento das decisões judiciais em larga escala, por meio da união de recursos paradigmáticos e da edição de súmulas vinculantes. Sugere se a rejeição destes novos institutos processuais com vistas à preservação do devido processo legal e do direito de acesso à justiça, em um sentido forte. _______________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT / The master´s dissertation is about the thesis of Brazilian constitutional meaning change on article 52, X, and the resultant incorporation of concentrated constitutional adjudication decision effect´s into judicial review ones. Here is taken a critical stand about that thesis, supported on Brazilian traditional judicial review features, such as a democratic way to develop constitutional adjudication. This essay still analyses some due process of law innovations, that goals to reduce the cases on Supremo Tribunal Federal (the Brazilian Supreme Court), by putting the Senate´s suspensive law act out of constitutional adjudication, and by turning all the court´s decisions into standard decisions, what amplify its power in a large way, and constructs here an under obligating decisions skeleton – a different kind of stare decisis. The dissertation recommends the rejection of those innovations in order to ensure the due process of law, as a dialectical procedure – case by case –, and the fairness judicial treatment right, on strong meaning.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.unb.br:10482/9360 |
Date | 24 March 2011 |
Creators | Araujo, Stéfano Cunha |
Contributors | Martins, Argemiro Cardoso Moreira |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | Portuguese |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UnB, instname:Universidade de Brasília, instacron:UNB |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0015 seconds