In recent years the three Prairie Pools have actively expanded their primary operations to
include a number of investments both within and outside of the agricultural sector. The Pools'
investment strategies are economically interesting because they are being pursued within the
context of a co-operative organizational structure which requires that the users of the cooperative
business also own, control, and benefit from its operations. This thesis examines the
possible economic incentives agricultural co-operatives may have to invest in vertically integrated
and diversified activities using the case of the Western Canadian co-operative elevator companies
as an example.
The analysis undertaken in this thesis is structured in two ways. First, the economic
literature regarding co-operative formation and conventional firm expansion is surveyed. This
analysis suggests that an important difference between vertically integrated investments and
diversified investments is that they are motivated by the realization of distincly different sets of
economic benefits for the co-operative firm and its members. It is argued that co-operative
vertical integration can convey benefits to members indirectly through the market, in the form of
increased producer margins and improved market access. However, these benefits may not
impact the "bottom line" of the co-operative firm. Diversification can, on the other hand, provide
a co-operative with direct monetary benefits in the form of improved financial performance and
increased profits, which can translate into increased patronage refunds available to members.
The second component of this analysis involves the development of a simulation model to
examine the implications of an additional hypothesis proposed to explain co-operative expansion.
The proposed hypothesis is based on the notion that perhaps the indirect market benefits from cooperation
and co-operative expansion are being undervalued. This undervaluation can result in a
preoccupation with the monetary benefits from co-operative business, and may therefore cause a
bias towards diversified investments. The model developed in this thesis illustrates that, although
such a bias may improve a co-operative's rate of return, it may also result in significant
opportunity costs for agricultural producers due to a decrease in a co-operative's pro-competitive
effect on primary markets. / Land and Food Systems, Faculty of / Graduate
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UBC/oai:circle.library.ubc.ca:2429/3702 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Harris, Andrea Luise |
| Source Sets | University of British Columbia |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, Thesis/Dissertation |
| Format | 4804904 bytes, application/pdf |
| Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds