Return to search

Creativity, relationality, affect, ethics: outlining a modest (aesthetic) ontology

Are artists autonomous agents? Are they individuals? Engaging with these seemingly commonsensical questions is the objective of this doctoral dissertation. Moreover, my answer to both questions is: no. My objective herein, then, will be to develop the following argument: that because the individual elements of creative, art-producing networks are so profoundly relational, to speak of individual elements or of agents or artists at all is to describe an incomplete picture. After all, how can any individual action occur or individual element exist in the absence of that upon which that action is enacted, or without that action being made possible by another element or "individual"?

By engaging with these questions this dissertation challenges conventional notions of creativity, individuality, and agency by suggesting that creative forms of expression for example: artistic, technological, social, political are always collective enunciations that issue forth and come into being as products of interdependent relationships.

I dismantle and then recast how we think about artistic creativity by arguing that if individuals are so intertwined with their networks that their very capacities are produced by the networks relationality itself, they (individuals) might be able to be (categorically) dispensed with entirely. In other words, I begin to ponder the question: How can we think about networks without thinking or making assumptions about individuals? I suggest that emphasizing that relationships are the generative actors that produce actuality compels us to rethink anthropocentric assumptions, and can lead to more open and creative ways of relating to the world around us.

I conclude by arguing that since our fate, existence, and identity as creators is inextricably linked to, and determined by, our relations with others, we must predispose ourselves to this co-fatedness by recalling Nietzsches invocation that we embrace and be open to our fate by loving it that we amor fati. In other words, in order to attune ourselves to the fullest range of possibilities in a situation in order to be truly creative and to become-artist we must become open to the creative potential of relationality itself, even if it requires that we assume a more modest view of ourselves. / Cultural Theory and Visual Art

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LACETR/oai:collectionscanada.gc.ca:AEU.10048/1423
Date11 1900
CreatorsTiessen, Matthew P
ContributorsShields, Rob (Sociology), Whitelaw, Anne (Art & Design), Chisholm, Dianne (English and Film Studies), Caulfield, Sean (Art & Design), Seigworth, Gregory (Communication and Theatre)
Source SetsLibrary and Archives Canada ETDs Repository / Centre d'archives des thèses électroniques de Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
Format2436100 bytes, application/pdf

Page generated in 0.002 seconds