Submitted by PPG Servi?o Social (servico-social-pg@pucrs.br) on 2017-12-26T11:17:40Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese - Conrado Paulino da Rosa.pdf: 2767305 bytes, checksum: 211404d522ad33b740092a51673977e7 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-12-26T19:20:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese - Conrado Paulino da Rosa.pdf: 2767305 bytes, checksum: 211404d522ad33b740092a51673977e7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-26T19:25:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese - Conrado Paulino da Rosa.pdf: 2767305 bytes, checksum: 211404d522ad33b740092a51673977e7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-11-08 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The present thesis addresses, in an interdisciplinary way, the management of the life of the children after the dissolution of a marriage or a common-law marriage. The research begins with the analysis of the advance of the legislation pertinent to the thematic having in view that originally in our legal system there was only the prediction of the unilateral custody that, because of social issues, ended up being determined only in favor of the mother. With the attribution, the ascendant custodial parent exclusively decides on all matters pertaining to the life of the offspring. However, in 2008, Law 11,698 amended articles 1,583 and 1,584 of the Civil Code to establish the possibility of shared custody between parents, which is ?joint responsibility and the exercise of the rights and duties of the father and the mother who do not live under the same roof, concerning the family power of common children?. Nevertheless, since then, it has been usual the social confusion of the institute of the sharing with of the partial custody, which would represent a static division of time between both parents, in which the parent in his company would have exclusive decision-making power. Considering that there was never the possibility of partial custody in Brazil, in 2014 there was a need for a new amendment modifying the Civil Code through Law 13,058. Among the changes, the application of shared custody became the preferential route and the unilateral, as a consequence, the restrictive way. In addition, it was clarified that the sharing can be applied even when parents reside in different cities and also when there is litigation between them. Another fact to be considered is the constant presence of processes where there is parental alienation between the parents. According to Law 12,318/2010, it is considered an act of parental alienation the interference in the psychological formation of the child or adolescent promoted or inducted by one of the parents, by the grandparents or by those who have the child or adolescent under their authority, custody or supervision to repudiate or to cause damage to the establishment or maintenance of bonds with the parent. In this vein lies the problem of this thesis: in which way does joint custody represent some kind of change in coparenting? Through the analysis of content, using the documentary analysis as a research procedure and, as a corpus of analysis the legislation on the subject, which are Federal Constitutions, Civil Code of 1916 (Law 3,071/1916), Married Woman Statute (Law 4,121/1962), Constitutional Amendment n. 9/1977, Child and Adolescent Statute (Law 8,069/1990), Civil Code of 2002 (Law 10,406), Law 11,698/2008, Law 12,318/2010, Law 13,058/2014 and Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 (Law 13,105). Moreover, this thesis will be based on bibliographies, not only from Social Service, but also from Psychology and Law. It will seek to verify the viability of the coactive shared custody as a hindering means of the practice of parental alienation and also as a way of effectuation of the rights of children and adolescents. / A presente tese aborda, de forma interdisciplinar, a gest?o da vida dos filhos ap?s a dissolu??o de um casamento ou de uma uni?o est?vel. A pesquisa inicia com a an?lise do avan?o da legisla??o pertinente a tem?tica tendo em vista que, originalmente, em nosso ordenamento jur?dico, existia apenas a previs?o da guarda unilateral a qual, pela pr?tica social, acabava sendo determinada apenas em favor da genitora. Com a sua atribui??o, o ascendente detentor da guarda passa a decidir de modo exclusivo todas as quest?es pertinentes a vida da prole. Todavia, em 2008, a Lei 11.698 alterou os artigos 1.583 e 1.584 do C?digo Civil para estabelecer a possibilidade da guarda compartilhada entre os genitores, sendo ela a ?responsabiliza??o conjunta e o exerc?cio de direitos e deveres do pai e da m?e que n?o vivam sob o mesmo teto, concernentes ao poder familiar dos filhos comuns?. Mesmo assim, desde ent?o, mostrou-se frequente a confus?o social do instituto do compartilhamento com o da guarda alternada, que representaria uma divis?o est?tica do tempo entre ambos os genitores onde, nessa estrutura, aquele genitor que se encontraria em sua companhia deteria poder exclusivo de decis?o. Considerando que jamais existiu a possibilidade de guarda alternada no Brasil, em 2014, houve a necessidade de nova altera??o modificando o C?digo Civil, por meio da Lei 13.058. Dentre as altera??es, a aplica??o da guarda compartilhada passou ser a via preferencial e a unilateralidade, em consequ?ncia, a sa?da restritiva. Al?m disso, houve o esclarecimento de que o compartilhamento pode ser aplicado mesmo quando os pais residam em cidades diferentes e, tamb?m, quando existir o lit?gio entre os genitores. Outro fato a ser considerado ? a presen?a constante de processos onde existe a presen?a de aliena??o parental entre os genitores. Segundo a Lei 12.318/2010, considera-se ato de aliena??o parental a interfer?ncia na forma??o psicol?gica da crian?a ou do adolescente promovida ou induzida por um dos genitores, pelos av?s ou pelos que tenham a crian?a ou adolescente sob a sua autoridade, guarda ou vigil?ncia para que repudie genitor ou que cause preju?zo ao estabelecimento ou ? manuten??o de v?nculos com este. Nessa esteira ? que reside a problem?tica da presente tese: exsurge como problem?tica da presente tese: de que forma a guarda compartilhada representa uma mudan?a na forma de cogest?o parental? Por meio da an?lise de conte?do, a partir de Laurence Bardin, utilizamos como procedimento de pesquisa a an?lise documental e, enquanto corpus de an?lise as legisla??es a respeito da tem?tica, quais sejam, Constitui??es Federais, C?digo Civil de 1916 (Lei 3.071/1916), Estatuto da Mulher Casada (Lei 4.121/1962), Emenda Constitucional n. 9/1977, Estatuto da Crian?a e do Adolescente (Lei 8.069/1990), C?digo Civil de 2002 (Lei 10.406), Lei 11.698/2008, Lei 12.318/2010, Lei 13.058/2014 e C?digo de Processo Civil de 2015 (Lei 13.105). Al?m disso, fundamentar-se-? a presente tese com bibliografias, n?o apenas do Servi?o Social, mas tamb?m, da Psicologia e do Direito, buscar-se-? compreender os desafios do compartilhamento coativo da guarda enquanto meio obstaculizador da pr?tica da aliena??o parental, mas tamb?m, como possibilidade de efetiva??o dos direitos da crian?a e do adolescente.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7787 |
| Date | 08 November 2017 |
| Creators | Rosa, Conrado Paulino da |
| Contributors | Grossi, Patr?cia Krieger |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Servi?o Social, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -5042336829439580540, 500, 500, 500, 600, -6557531471218110192, -8796676102858938039, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds