Submitted by Carolina Ellen Spinola Machado (carolina.machado@unesp.br) on 2018-07-17T17:50:57Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Tese Mestrado Carol Spinola Correção Final.pdf: 1288993 bytes, checksum: 2bda3149606dd9c289679698a83d6cbc (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ana Cristina Jorge null (anacris@fclar.unesp.br) on 2018-07-17T18:28:03Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
machado_ces_me_arafo_int.pdf: 1335157 bytes, checksum: c25b86d1526dd6b3333d99b75d0e04b1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-17T18:28:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
machado_ces_me_arafo_int.pdf: 1335157 bytes, checksum: c25b86d1526dd6b3333d99b75d0e04b1 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-05-17 / O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a resistência flexural de materiais restauradores resinosos provisórios (Systemp Onlay, Bifix Temp, Provyl Master F, Fill Magic e Clip F) após a fotopolimerização com sistema de fotoativação LED-laser: Radii-Cal (SDI, São Paulo, SP, BR). A resistência flexural demonstrada pelos materiais restauradores provisórios Provi Master F (Wilcos), Systemp (Ivoclair) e Fill Magic (Coltene) foi similar (p >0,05) e maior que a demonstrada pelos materiais restauradores BiFix (Voco) e Clip F (Voco) (p < 0,05). Por outro lado, a resistência flexural apresentada pelo BiFix e Clip F foi semelhante entre si (p > 0.05). Concluimos assim que os materiais Provi Master F, Systemp e Fill Magic são materiais de melhor escolha quando necessitamos de uma resistência maior às forças oclusais. / The objective of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength of temporary resin restorative materials (Systemp Onlay, Bifix Temp, Provyl Master F, Fill Magic e Clip F) after photopolymerization with LED-laser photoactivation system: : Radii-Cal (SDI, São Paulo, SP, BR). The flexural strength demonstrated by the provisional restorative materials Provi Master F (Wilcos), Systemp (Ivoclair) e Fill Magic (Coltene) was similar (p >0,05) and greater than that demonstrated by restorative materials BiFix (Voco) e Clip F (Voco) (p < 0,05). On the other hand, the flexural strength demonstrated by Be Fil and Clip F were similar among themselves (p > 0.05). We conclude that the materials Provi Master F, Systemp and Fill Magic are materials of better choice when we need a greater resistance to occlusal forces.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/154535 |
| Date | 17 May 2018 |
| Creators | Machado, Carolina Ellen Spínola |
| Contributors | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Dantas, Andréa Abi Rached [UNESP] |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP, instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista, instacron:UNESP |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 600, 600 |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds