We first show theoretically and in simulation how power varies as a function of SNP correlation structure with currently-implemented gene-based testing methods. We propose alternative testing methods whose power does not vary with the correlation structure. We then propose hypothesis tests for detecting prevalence-incidence bias in case-control studies, a bias perhaps overrepresented in GWAS due to currently used study designs. Lastly, we hypothesize how different incentive structures used to keep clinical trial participants in studies may interact with a background of dependent censoring and result in variation in the bias of the Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimator.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:harvard.edu/oai:dash.harvard.edu:1/11124831 |
| Date | 27 September 2013 |
| Creators | Swanson, David Michael |
| Contributors | Betensky, Rebecca Aubrey, Lange, Christoph |
| Publisher | Harvard University |
| Source Sets | Harvard University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Rights | open |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds