Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:33:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
438244.pdf: 325326 bytes, checksum: ae1f1ade5626d4bdbb3221d0cafbdb9b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-03-30 / The present thesis pursues to indicate the new, or renewed, legal techniques including comprising legal procedural to enable better control of discretionary administrative activities of the State, in order to promote a practical and concrete effectiveness of the goals of the Republic of Brazil printed on Article 3rd of the Brazilian Constitution 1988. The purposes to present as part of discretionary administrative act, also, the full scope of jurisdictional mastery (sindicabilidade), being that, it represents the expression of the public onus established in the current Democratic Republican State of Law, as diction of the Federal Constitution of 1988. Therefore, it is analyzed the role of Public Administration in the State duty of the concretization and to implement realization of public interest, through a concatenated and harmonious juridical administrative system, made possible by the exercise of prerogatives (powers) and constraints (principles) of the administrative activity of the State. In this scenario, it is unblemished the structure and operation of administrative acts, with highlights to those who have some legal margin of governance, known as discretionary. It is made known, also, the current tendency of jurisprudence of the Superior Courts on judicial review of discretionary administrative act, indicating to the heterogeneity of decisions on the subject, a fact that demands the establishment of a new "North" to be followed to provide adequate protection of Constitutional state's judicial administrative activity. Thus, this work analyzes the necessity to adapt old techniques of interpretation of the administrative discretionary act, and indicates ways to overcome practices that no longer maintain the current Constitutional context, such as, among others: the shield of administrative merit against the respective judicial control and review, the shallow interpretation of the Theory of Tripartition of Powers the absence of democratic legitimacy of the State Judge. Consequently, there are appropriate ways to assist the maintenance and sustainability of the system as a legitimate form of protecting the lives of citizens: the consequentialist interpretation, the rational weighing of the values involved, and the inclusion of the criterion of administrative act demonstration of a causal nexus between the production of the act and the public interest to be achieved. In conclusion, the Thesis suggests a technique of Law, judicial-procedural, able to deal with intimidations and battering on rights arising from discretionary administrative activities unreached that undermine the state system legitimately established, bringing systemic instability, generating event of negative consequences for the development intersubjective for the participants of the State. It follows then that there are state administrative activities outside the scope of the constitutional principle of judicial protection of inseparability thus creating shadow areas of administrative activity of the State, misshapen republican and democratic values printed in the Constitution. Therefore, such discretionary activities need to be reincorporated into the Constitutional legal contexture, necessary in relation to their sustainability, through the techniques suggested in order to objectification, to extent maximum is possible, the mastery(sindicabilidade) of the administrative merit, especially those that bring relevant national systemic astonishment as evidence that any public act must be under the aegis of Constitutional Republican system of responsibility and control of public activity. / A tese ora apresentada consiste na formula??o de novas, ou renovadas, t?cnicas jur?dicas inclusive, processuais-judiciais para viabilizar um melhor controle da atividade administrativa discricion?ria do Estado, com a finalidade de promover uma concreta efetividade dos objetivos da Rep?blica do Brasil estampados no art. 3.o da CF/88. Visa apresentar o ato administrativo discricion?rio como parte, tamb?m, do ?mbito de plena sindicabilidade jurisdicional, visto que representa a express?o do ?nus p?blico estabelecido no atual Estado republicano democr?tico de Direito, conforme dic??o constitucional. Para tanto, faz-se an?lise do papel da Administra??o P?blica no dever estatal de concretiza??o e realiza??o do interesse p?blico, por meio de um concatenado e harm?nico regime jur?dico administrativo, viabilizado pelo exerc?cio de prerrogativas (poderes) e sujei??es (princ?pios) da atividade administrativa do Estado. Nesse cen?rio, evidencia-se a estrutura??o e operacionaliza??o dos atos administrativos, com destaques aos que possuem determinada margem legal de gest?o p?blica, denominados discricion?rios. Demonstra-se, tamb?m, a atual tend?ncia jurisprudencial dos Tribunais Superiores sobre a tutela jurisdicional do ato administrativo discricion?rio, apontando a heterogeneidade de decis?es sobre o tema, fato que demanda o estabelecimento de um novo norte a ser seguido para a presta??o da constitucional adequada tutela judicial da atividade administrativa estatal. Assim, analisa-se a necessidade de se adaptar antigas t?cnicas de interpreta??o do ato administrativo discricion?rio e indicam-se caminhos para a supera??o de pr?ticas que n?o mais se sustentam no atual contexto constitucional, tais como: a blindagem do m?rito administrativo ante o respectivo controle judicial; a rasa interpreta??o da teoria da triparti??o dos poderes; a falta de legitima??o democr?tica do Estado-Juiz. Desse modo, tem-se como caminhos adequados para auxiliar a manuten??o e a sustentabilidade do sistema, a interpreta??o consequencialista, a pondera??o racional dos valores envolvidos e a inclus?o do crit?rio do ato administrativo de demonstra??o do nexo causal entre a produ??o do ato e o interesse p?blico a ser concretizado. Finalmente, a tese sugere t?cnica de Direito, processual-judicial, apta a tratar de amea?as e agress?es a direitos provenientes de atos administrativos discricion?rios de interesse nacional que abalam o sistema estatal, trazendo instabilidade sist?mica, fato gerador de consequ?ncias negativas para o desenvolvimento intersubjetivo dos part?cipes do Estado. Conclui-se, ent?o, que existem atividades administrativas estatais fora do alcance do princ?pio constitucional da inafastabilidade da tutela jurisdicional, criando, assim, zonas de sombra da atividade administrativa do Estado, disforme aos valores republicanos e democr?ticos estampados na Constitui??o. Isso posto, tais atividades discricion?rias precisam ser reincorporadas ao constitucional tecido jur?dico, em respeito ? sua necess?ria sustentabilidade, por meio das t?cnicas sugeridas, visando ? objetiva??o, ao m?ximo poss?vel, da sindicabilidade do m?rito administrativo, com destaque ?quelas que tragam relevante abalo sist?mico nacional, como demonstra??o de que todo e qualquer ato p?blico precisa estar sob a ?gide do constitucional regime republicano de responsabilidade e de controle da atividade p?blica.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4184 |
| Date | 30 March 2012 |
| Creators | Fran?a, Phillip Gil |
| Contributors | Molinaro, Carlos Alberto |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 500, 600, 2194221341323903125 |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds