Return to search

The nature of association and dissociation for common purpose liability

Since the pre-requisites for common-purpose liability where there was no prior agreement were
laid down in S V Mgedezi 1989 (1) SA 687 (A), the appellate division has moved to resolve related
controversial issues. These include the question whether a joiner-in is a perpetrator or
accomplice, and whether he should be convicted of murder or attempted murder.


It is the question of dissociation which has remained elusive. Courts accept that a person should
only be criminally liable when his dissociation from a common purpose takes place after the
commencement of execution stage is reached. My submission is that whether one dissociates himself
should be a question of fact, to be determined according to the circumstances of each case.
Such determination should pay close attention to the doctrine of proximity. Where a person
played a minor role, or acted under the influence of a dominant partner, this should be reflected
in the punishment imposed. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M. (Criminal & Procedural Law)

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:unisa/oai:uir.unisa.ac.za:10500/17306
Date11 1900
CreatorsMakiwane, Paterson Nkosemntu
ContributorsSnyman, C. R., Ochonogor, Chukunoye Enunuwe
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeDissertation
Format1 online resource (iii, 53 leaves)

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds