Return to search

Response comparison of an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter, a direct-ion storage dosimeter, and a thermoluminescence dosimeter

This study was undertaken to compare the response of three dosimeters to
different environments. Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant wants to replace the
current badge of record. The RaDos DIS-1 direct-ion storage dosimeter (DIS-1) and the
Landauer InLight optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSL) are the two
candidates for replacement of the Panasonic UD-802 thermoluminescence dosimeter
(TLD). The dosimeters were compared in five categories: dose linearity, dose-rate
linearity, fade response, humidity response, and the angular dependence of the
dosimeters.
The major results include verified linear relationship evidence for dose and doserate
and a better fade response for both the DIS-1 and OSL. The TLDs faded by 9.2%
over a month and the DIS-1 and OSL faded by 4.2% and 1%, respectively. Following a
dose of 557.5 mrem, the dosimeters were exposed to different relative humidites. The
dose to the DIS-1 and OSL did not change drastically while the TLDs dose readout was
reduced by 10%. Finally, the angular dependence of the dosimeters was compared and
the worst responses were 66% at 90° in the horizontal orientation for the OSL and 1.7% at 90° in the horizontal orientation for the DIS-1. Based on the results of these tests the
OSL seems like a more viable candidate for the new badge or record.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2979
Date15 May 2009
CreatorsHernandez, Pete Jevon
ContributorsPoston, John W.
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeBook, Thesis, Electronic Thesis, text
Formatelectronic, application/pdf, born digital

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds