Return to search

Техничко-стилске карактеристике драматургије Леонида Андрејева у периоду од 1905. до 1910. године / Tehničko-stilske karakteristike dramaturgije Leonida Andrejeva u periodu od 1905. do 1910. godine / Stylistic and Technical Characteristics of Leonid Andreyev’s Plays (1905-1910)

<p>Menjajući poetike, istražujući u oblasti forme, Leonid Andrejev u svom ranom dramskom stvarala&scaron;tvu ostaje veran svojoj inicijalnoj ideji: on promi&scaron;lja ljudsku misao, njenu prirodu i njene moguće manifestacije, kao i moć i nemoć ljudske misli u svetu koji ga okružuje. U prvom periodu svog ranog stvarala&scaron;tva, definisanom kao realistički teatar, pisac sagledava tri različite manifestacije ljudske misli: nauku, religiju i revoluciju. U perodu potrage za novom dramskom formom, supstancionalnom teatru, misao dolazi u sukob sa supstancom i rađa se ideja da ljudska misao nije svemoguća, to jest da čovek ne može da živi vođen isključivo razumnim načelom. U trećem periodu svog ranog dramskog stvarala&scaron;tva, takozvanom melodramskom teatru, pisac se naizgled udaljava od svoje osnovne teme i afirmi&scaron;ući studentske uspomene, na biografskoj građi stvara dve psiholo&scaron;ke melodrame.<br />&nbsp; U sva tri navedena teatra, realističkom, supstancionalnom i melodramskom, pisac se služio bogatim aresenalom tehničko-stilskih sredstava. U radu se tumači upotreba hromatskog i muzičkog prosedea, priroda i funkcija didaskalija, portetna metaforičnost likova, kao i simbolični plan drama, te njihove tematske i idejne koncepcije.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp; Zaključak je da je u potrazi za formom, u tim spontanim smenama poetika i bogatom kori&scaron;ćenju tehničko-stilskih sredstava (npr., montažnost dramskog teksta, kolektivni monolog, personalizacija i depersonalizacija aktera radnje; upotreba metafore, poređenja, metonimije, sinegdohe, sinestezije, groteske, lirskih paralelizama itd.), L. Andrejev ostao dosledan svojoj primarnoj ideji, promi&scaron;ljanju o moći i nemoći ljudske misli. Ta ista ideja u&scaron;la je u osnovu teatra panpsihe, koji je okarakterisao naredni plodan period ovog dramskog pisca.</p> / <p>Although he was not consistent in his approach when poetics and the form were concerned, Leonid Andreyev never gave up on the initial idea in his early plays: in them he was deeply involved in consideration of human thought, its nature and its possible manifestations, as well as its power, or the lack of it. In the first phase of his early works, which is in this thesis termed a realist theater, the playwright takes into consideration three different manifestations of human thought: science, religion and revolution. During the period in which he was searching for a new form for his plays, the so-called substantialist theater, thought is confronted with substance, upon which a new idea emerges, that of powerlessness of human thought&ndash; human beings cannot live their lives based solely on the principle of rationality. In the third period of his early writing, the so-called melodramatic theater, the author seemingly deviates from main theme, and by returning to his university days, creates two autobiographical, psychological plays.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp; In all three theaters, the realist, the substantialist and the melodramatic, the author uses a rich palette of technical and stylistic devices. This thesis offers analyses of chromatic and musical principles; the nature and function of stage directions; metaphorical nature of the characters; as well as the symbolism present in the plays.<br />&nbsp;&nbsp; Searching for the form, through spontaneous shifts between different poetics and an array of technical and stylistic devices (such as editing of plays, collective monologue, personalization and depersonalization of the characters, the use of metaphor, simile, metonymy, synecdoche, synesthesia, grotesque, lyrical parallelisms), Leonid Andreyev remained loyal to his initial idea of pondering the power and weakness of human thought. This idea has become a constitutive part of pan-psyche theater that marked the next, rather fruitful period of this playwright.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:uns.ac.rs/oai:CRISUNS:(BISIS)110601
Date15 June 2019
CreatorsPanaotović Melina
ContributorsKosanović Bogdan, Grdinić Nikola, Ramadanski Draginja
PublisherUniverzitet u Novom Sadu, Filozofski fakultet u Novom Sadu, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy at Novi Sad
Source SetsUniversity of Novi Sad
LanguageSerbian
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypePhD thesis

Page generated in 0.0015 seconds