DSGE models are as structural models capable of estimating what would have happened if some part of economy or shocks to it had been different. We consider three such differences in the recent Czech history: no financial shocks during the crisis in 2008-2009; eurozone membership during the crisis in 2008-2009; and no foreign exchange interventions of the Czech National Bank in November 2013. For this purpose, we employ a small open economy DSGE model with financial frictions and estimate it with Bayesian inference. Our results show that impact of financial shocks on GDP growth was negligible. Further, eurozone membership would have made crisis more severe; GDP growth in 2009Q1 would have been -6% instead of -3% and economy would have been in deflation for the five consecutive periods. Difference is explained by strong depreciation of exchange rate during crisis that would not have occurred with the fixed exchange rate. Lastly, the Czech National Banks's foreign exchange interventions increased GDP growth by as much as 0.8 percentage point and saved economy from deflation in all following quarters. They worked through depreciation of exchange rate and consequent improvement in trade balance and increase in price of imported goods. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:347224 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Svačina, David |
| Contributors | Maršál, Aleš, Malovaná, Simona |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds