The study focuses on AI and source criticism and teachers' views and teaching in this. The teachers interviewed are teachers at junior high school but also high school in the subjects SO and civic studies. The purpose of the survey has been to account for and problematize civic studies teachers' approach to AI and its connection to source criticism.The teachers who were interviewed all have different experiences in the teaching profession, but they all are educated in civic studies at university. The teachers are working in the central parts of Sweden. The question that the study answers are:1. What is the teachers view of AI and how does it affect their teaching of source criticism? The teachers in the study agree on the importance of source criticism in teaching. They all teach about source criticism in their teaching, some a little more while others a little less. Time has been the biggest reason why source criticism has been given a little less space in some teachers' teaching.All the teachers in the study have changed their teaching because of AI. The teachers with more experience and more material have had to make a bigger change in their teaching, while the younger ones were already thrown into a world where AI was already active. One of the teachers testifies about how his teaching philosophy has taken a turn for the worse with AI as he cannot teach in the way he really wants.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:kau-100041 |
| Date | January 2024 |
| Creators | Holmberg, Daniel |
| Publisher | Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap (from 2013) |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0015 seconds