This study utilized the Delphi technique to codify the opinions of experts in the library field regarding the role of the State Library Agency in the year 2000. Six panels representing State Library Agency directors, public, academic, school and special librarians; and other specializations rated the probability and desirability of thirty-five role statements. Respondents agreed that the current methods of local-state-federal funding would continue; awarding of federal funds directly to eligible libraries would be unlikely and undesirable; state networks would be governed by a commission with representation from the State Library Agency; multitype cooperatives are desirable; state library agencies should reorient their image to include all types of libraries. Concern was expressed about the need for personnel skilled in new roles, especially networking and the application of new technology. / The study found no significant differences between the panels regarding the role of the State Library Agency. The study concluded that State Library Agency policy seems responsive to the expectations of its constituents and that conflict is inevitable as state library agencies change their roles in the library environment. Conflict assists in the diffusion of knowledge regarding the State Library Agency functions and activities. Further, it was recommended that State Library Agency directors seek personnel with skills appropriate to new roles, especially networking, new technology and relationships with all types of libraries. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-01, Section: A, page: 0006. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1983.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_75264 |
Contributors | MEDINA, SUE O'NEAL., Florida State University |
Source Sets | Florida State University |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Text |
Format | 236 p. |
Rights | On campus use only. |
Relation | Dissertation Abstracts International |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds