Section 14 of the Constitution provides for the right to privacy, which includes the right not to
have the privacy of communications infringed. The right is also protected at common law - a
breach of a person's privacy constitutes an iniura. E-mail communications are therefore
protected by both, the common law and the Constitution.
The question that this work seeks to answer is, whether the Government has the right to intercept
and/or monitor private e-mail communications.
The right to privacy is not absolute, case law and legislation show that this right can be limited.
At common law, a valid defence will negate the unlawfulness of the invasion. In terms of the
Constitution, the right to privacy can only be limited in accordance with the limitation clause section
36. For each case, courts will have to balance, the government's interest in combating
crime and that of the citizen to the privacy of their e-mail communications.
In seeking to answer the question, this work considers the protection afforded by the common
law and the Constitution. It also considers statutes which limit the right to privacy, including
whether these statutes are applicable to e-mail communications and if they are, whether they
constitute a justifiable limitation of the right, for example: the Regulation of Interception of
Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act and the Criminal
Procedure Act - which was enacted when the 'cyber-world' was non-existent. All statutes,
applicable to e-mail communications, provide for some form of requirements or guidelines
before communications can be intercepted or/ and monitored.
The right to privacy is also protected in foreign jurisdictions and is not absolute. There is
protection only against unreasonable invasions of privacy.
In conclusion, both statutory law and common law permit the government, within limitations, to
intercept or/ and monitor private e-mail communications. Where there are guidelines, regulating this power, the circumstance under which and when it can be exercised. This will amount to a
reasonable and justifiable limitation and therefore the right will not be violated. / Thesis (LL.M.)-University of Natal, Durban, 2003.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/5259 |
| Date | January 2003 |
| Creators | Majola, Zanele Precious. |
| Contributors | McQuoid-Mason, David Jan. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds