Many education systems around the world use a centralized admission process to assign students to schools. By definition, some applicants to oversubscribed schools are not offered admission to their most-preferred school. Thus, one naturally asks whether it makes a difference to applicants’ educational opportunities and outcomes which schools they apply to, are offered admission to, and eventually enroll in. Each year in Mexico City, about 300,000 teenagers apply for a seat at one of the nearly 650 public upper-secondary schools. In this centralized, merit-based admission process, applicants are assigned to a school based on entrance examination score and their ranked list of school choices, subject to school capacity constraints.
In this dissertation, I include two papers assessing data from the upper-secondary application cohorts in Mexico City from 2005 to 2009. In the first paper, I find evidence of socio-economic stratification across schools. I also find dissimilarities in the application behavior of individuals according to their socio-economic background, even for those with high achievement levels. Based on qualitative and quantitative data from a small sample of applicants, I suggest that in addition to differences in economic resources, asymmetries in access to information might help to explain disparities in the application behavior of individuals from different socio-economic backgrounds.
In the second paper, I capitalize on the natural experiment created at each oversubscribed public upper-secondary school in Mexico City by the imposition of exogenous admission cut-off scores. Using a regression-discontinuity design, I estimate that, on average, upper-secondary applicants who score just above the admission threshold for a more competitive school (i.e. a school with higher cut-off score and higher average examination scores) have lower probability of graduating on time and within 5 years than do applicants who scored just below the admission threshold. Given the high take-up rates of the offers of admission, I find that the effects for enrollment in a more competitive school are only slightly larger than they are in their analogous reduced-form estimates. In addition, I show that effects differ across the distribution of admission cut-off scores and for applicants with selected socio-demographic characteristics who scored just above the admission threshold. / Quantitative Policy Analysis in Education
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:harvard.edu/oai:dash.harvard.edu:1/16461054 |
| Date | 02 May 2016 |
| Creators | Ortega Hesles, Maria Elena |
| Contributors | Murnane, Richard |
| Publisher | Harvard University |
| Source Sets | Harvard University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | open |
Page generated in 0.0105 seconds