Return to search

Dynamic coordination with network externalities: procrastination can be efficient

Submitted by Deivis Angeli (deivisangeli@gmail.com) on 2018-06-06T06:09:47Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DynamicCoordinationWithNetworkExternalities.pdf: 394741 bytes, checksum: e157b70d33e77a4676224e1c72a1e34d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Katia Menezes de Souza (katia.menezes@fgv.br) on 2018-06-06T12:05:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DynamicCoordinationWithNetworkExternalities.pdf: 394741 bytes, checksum: e157b70d33e77a4676224e1c72a1e34d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Suzane Guimarães (suzane.guimaraes@fgv.br) on 2018-06-06T12:50:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DynamicCoordinationWithNetworkExternalities.pdf: 394741 bytes, checksum: e157b70d33e77a4676224e1c72a1e34d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-06T12:50:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DynamicCoordinationWithNetworkExternalities.pdf: 394741 bytes, checksum: e157b70d33e77a4676224e1c72a1e34d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-05-09 / I analyze a dynamic coordination model under quasi-hyperbolic discounting. The main result is that present bias can induce a society to coordinate efficiently. When considering a transition from network A to B, higher present bias induces individuals to ask for higher relative quality of B, which is also what the central planner dictates, but for different reasons. Present biased agents overvalue relative quality, as positive externalities coming from more individuals in network B are more distant in the future, because transitioning takes time. The planner's motives are the negative externalities inflicted on agents 'stuck' in A during a transition. / É analizado um modelo de coordenação dinâmica sob desconto quasi-hiperbólico. O resultado principal é que a presença de miopia temporal pode induzir uma sociedade a coordenar eficientemente. Considerando a transição de uma rede A para uma rede B, maior miopia temporal induz indivíduos a serem mais exigentes em termos de qualidade intrínseca relativa da rede B, o que é a mesma coisa que um planejador central ditaria, mas por razões diferentes. Indivíduos com miopia temporal valorizam excessivamente a qualidade relativa, pois as externalidades recebidas por haver muitos indivíduos na rede B estão em um futuro distante e as transições não são imediatas. Os motivos da sugestão do planejador central são as externalidades negativas infligidas em agentes 'presos' na rede A durante uma transição.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:bibliotecadigital.fgv.br:10438/24023
Date09 May 2018
CreatorsAngeli, Deivis
ContributorsGuimarães, Bernardo de Vasconcellos, Pereira, Ana Elisa Gonçalves, Escolas::EESP, Ferman, Bruno
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV, instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas, instacron:FGV
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0025 seconds