Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-10-18T19:26:56Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
IsabelKarolyneFernandesCosta_TESE.pdf: 2181357 bytes, checksum: 8d98e8818bf89e0f537997a189865771 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-10-18T22:25:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
IsabelKarolyneFernandesCosta_TESE.pdf: 2181357 bytes, checksum: 8d98e8818bf89e0f537997a189865771 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-18T22:25:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
IsabelKarolyneFernandesCosta_TESE.pdf: 2181357 bytes, checksum: 8d98e8818bf89e0f537997a189865771 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-07-07 / O objetivo dessa investiga??o foi analisar as evid?ncias de valida??o de um curso de Suporte B?sico de Vida (SBV) na modalidade de ensino a dist?ncia (EAD) para acad?micos e profissionais de sa?de de um Hospital Universit?rio. Trata-se de uma pesquisa metodol?gica, quantitativa, utilizando enquanto referencial te?rico a teoria psicom?trica de Pasquali. O estudo desenvolveu-se em duas etapas: constru??o e valida??o do conte?do de tr?s ferramentas: instrumento de avalia??o de conhecimento em suporte b?sico de vida (ACSBV); conte?do do curso de Suporte B?sico de Vida (CSBV) e roteiro do jogo educativo simulado de Suporte B?sico de Vida (JESBV). A amostra para valida??o do instrumento de avalia??o do conhecimento foi composta por 29 ju?zes e seis ju?zes para o curso e roteiro do jogo. A coleta de dados foi realizada entre agosto e setembro de 2016. O estudo foi aprovado (Parecer n? 1.709.004 e CAAE: 58511516.0.0000.5292) pelo Comit? de ?tica em Pesquisa do Hospital Universit?rio Onofre Lopes. Os dados foram analisados por meio de estat?stica descritiva e inferencial, utilizando os programas Microsoft-Excel e SPSS 20.0, com uso do ?ndice Kappa (K) e ?ndice de Validade de Conte?do (IVC), considerando aceit?vel K ?0,65 e IVC>0,80. O n?vel de signific?ncia estat?stica estabelecido para o valor de ? foi < 0,05. O ACSBV continha inicialmente 13 quest?es. Na valida??o do ACSBV, verificou-se que das 33 sugest?es realizadas, 18 foram acatadas, 3 rejeitadas e 12, ap?s an?lise de valores de IVC e Kappa, serviram de orienta??o para a exclus?o de tr?s quest?es. Assim, ao final foram removidas as quest?es (5, 6 e 13) com ?ndice K ou IVC menores que o estabelecido nesse estudo, sendo a clareza o requisito com menores valores de adequa??o. Na avalia??o global, ap?s retirada das tr?s quest?es, o instrumento final ficou com 10 quest?es e obteve IVC de 0,95 e K de 0,81. Quanto ao processo de valida??o do CSBV, verificou-se que das 16 sugest?es realizadas, 14 foram acatadas e apenas 2 rejeitadas. A maioria das sugest?es esteve relacionada aos requisitos avalia??o geral do conte?do, utilidade, clareza, objetividade e vocabul?rio. Desse modo, o CSBV foi validado com ?ndices satisfat?rios pelos ju?zes (IVC = 0,94; K = 0,87; nota m?dia 9,50). Quanto ao JESBV, esse foi desenvolvido em 13 telas, das quais 9 apresentaram conte?dos de SBV, e as demais orienta??es gerais para o avan?ar do jogo. A elabora??o do roteiro priorizou a complexidade gradativa dos conhecimentos em SBV com cuidados minuciosos na organiza??o dos textos e na proposta das anima??es. Das cinco sugest?es realizadas, todas foram acatadas, sendo a maioria relacionada aos requisitos de organiza??o, clareza e vocabul?rio. Nenhum item foi considerado inadequado, apresentando o jogo um valor m?dio de 0,95 de IVC; 0,81 de Kappa e nota m?dia de 9,67. O desenvolvimento de todas as ferramentas que comp?e o Curso de Suporte B?sico de Vida (CSBV) em EAD apesar de ter se mostrado um processo complexo e desafiador ? v?lido para apoiar o ensino de urg?ncia (nessa tem?tica) para acad?micos e profissionais de sa?de. / The objective of this research was to analyze the evidences of validation of a Basic Life Support (BLS) course in distance education for academics and health professionals of a University Hospital. It is a methodological and quantitative research that used as theoretical reference the psychometric theory of Pasquali. The study was developed in two stages: construction and validity of the content of three tools: tool for knowledge assessment in BLS; contents of the BLS course and simulated educational game on BLS. The sample for validation of the knowledge assessment instrument was composed by 29 judges and six judges for the course and script of the game. Data collection was performed between August and September 2016. The study was approved (Opinion No. 1.709.004 and CAAE: 58511516.0.0000.5292) by the Research Ethics Committee of Onofre Lopes University Hospital. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 20.0 softwares, using Kappa (K) index and Content Validity Index (CVI), being considering acceptable K?0,65 and CVI>0,80. The level of statistical significance established for the value of ? was <0,05. The knowledge assessment on BLS initially contained 13 questions. In the validation of the knowledge assessment on BLS, it was verified that of the 33 suggestions made, 18 were accepted, 3 were rejected and 12, after analysis of values of CVI and Kappa, served as guidance for the exclusion of three questions. Thus, it were removed the questions (5, 6 and 13) with a K or CVI values lower than the one established in this study, being clarity the requirement with lower values of adequacy. In the overall evaluation, after the removal of the three questions, the final instrument had 10 questions and obtained a CVI of 0,95 and K of 0,81. As for the BLS course validation process, it was verified that of the 16 suggestions made, 14 were accepted and only 2 rejected. Most suggestions were related to the general evaluation requirements of content, usefulness, clarity, objectivity and vocabulary. Thus, the BLS course was validated with satisfactory indexes by the judges (CVI 0,94, K 0,87, mean score 9,50). As for the educational game on BLS, it was developed in 13 screens, of which 9 presented BLS contents, and the other, general orientations for the advancement in the game. The elaboration of the script prioritized the gradual complexity of the BLS knowledge with meticulous care in the organization of the texts and the proposal of the animations. Of the five suggestions made, all were followed, most of them related to the requirements of organization, clarity and vocabulary. No item was considered inappropriate, with the game presenting an average value of 0,95 of CVI, 0,81 of Kappa and a mean score of 9,67. The development of all the tools that composed the BLS course in distance education, despite having proved to be a complex and challenging process, is valid to support emergency education (in this theme) for academics and health professionals.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24121 |
| Date | 07 July 2017 |
| Creators | Costa, Isabel Karolyne Fernandes |
| Contributors | 51326728415, Maia, Eul?lia Maria Chaves, 18112900434, Santos, Renata Silva, 00880689439, Dantas, Rodrigo Assis Neves, 04413804414, Schlosser, Thalyta Cristina Mansano, 36728216839, Torres, Gilson de Vasconcelos |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM CI?NCIAS DA SA?DE, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0037 seconds