Return to search

DECODING SKILL AND VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE IN READING COMPREHENSION

The relative importance of decoding skill and vocabulary knowledge to reading comprehension was investigated. Ninety-one fourth grade students from Hillsborough County Public School System were assessed on their decoding ability, vocabulary knowledge, and reading comprehension ability. Decoding ability was measured by (a) a 40-item Vocalization Latency Test (VL) utilizing a reaction-time apparatus; (b) a modified form of the Literary Assessment Battery Decoding Test (MLAB); and (c) the decoding section of the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT). Vocabulary knowledge was measured by the vocabulary score from the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills (CTBS). Reading comprehension, the dependent variable, was measured by (a) a multiple choice Cloze #1 Test which contained high frequency words at a fourth grade level; and by (b) an altered multiple choice Cloze #2 Test which contained a portion (up to 10 percent) of low frequency (unfamiliar) words. Significant correlations were found among the variables of interest. / Comparisons were made among several of the correlations. It was found that (a) the correlation between decoding skill (MLAB) and Cloze #2 was significantly lower than the correlation between vocabulary (CTBS) and Cloze #2; and (b) the correlation between decoding skill (MLAB) and Cloze #1 was significantly higher than the correlation between the same measure of decoding (MLAB) and Cloze #2 ((alpha) = .01). / Multiple regression analyses yielded the findings that (a) decoding made a significant contribution to reading comprehension (high frequency words, Cloze #1) when vocabulary was controlled; (b) vocabulary made a significant contribution to reading comprehension (high frequency words, Cloze #1) when decoding was controlled; (c) decoding did not make a significant contribution to reading comprehension (low frequency words, Cloze #2) when vocabulary was controlled; and (d) vocabulary made a significant contribution to reading comprehension (low frequency words, Cloze #2) when decoding was controlled. / The results indicate that students depended on both decoding and vocabulary for reading comprehension in Cloze #1. In contrast, the students were more dependent on their vocabulary knowledge in the comprehension of Cloze #2. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 43-12, Section: A, page: 3802. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1982.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_74987
ContributorsPERKINS, PEGGY GARDNER., Florida State University
Source SetsFlorida State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText
Format102 p.
RightsOn campus use only.
RelationDissertation Abstracts International

Page generated in 0.0019 seconds