The purpose of this study was to examine the procedures and requirements of a formative evaluation conducted on instructional materials designed for a U.S. population, but which also have potential use by a population of another country. The study involved two target populations, the United States and Brazil, and focused on determining if different cultural reactions are discernible through a formative evaluation process. / The methodology consisted of performing three formative evaluations: one-to-one, small group, and field trial. / The principal findings were: (1) The instructional revision decisions that were made based on the U.S. learner feedback were equally as relevant as the instructional revision decisions made on the basis of the Brazilian learner feedback. The format revision decisions made based on the U.S. learner feedback were related more to typographical errors than those format revision decisions made on the basis of the Brazilian feedback. The content revision decisions based on U.S. learner feedback were less useful than the content revision decisions made on the basis of the Brazilian learner feedback. (2) Of the 90 revisions made in the materials used by the U.S. learners, 10 were related to instructional changes, 79 regarded format aspects, and only one related to content modification. In the case of the Portuguese version, of the 59 modifications carried out, 11 were in relation to instructional aspects, 43 to format elements, and 5 regarding content revisions. (3) The analysis of the post-test scores (ANOVA test) determined that there was no significant difference in terms of achievement (F(1.56) = 0.5, p < .05). The U.S. learners attained an average of 7 out of 24 objectives, and the Brazilian learners 8 out of 24 objectives. Eighty percent of the students in both groups missed the same six objectives and only one of the objectives was achieved by both groups. Both groups showed a neutral attitude toward the materials. (4) The formative evaluation is a useful tool in identifying differential cultural responses to instructional materials. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-11, Section: A, page: 3275. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1984.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_75443 |
| Contributors | ROJAS, ALICIA MABEL., Florida State University |
| Source Sets | Florida State University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text |
| Format | 191 p. |
| Rights | On campus use only. |
| Relation | Dissertation Abstracts International |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds