Plyometrics is primarily used by coaches and sport scientists to improve explosive power among
athletes who participate in dynamic, high intensity type of sports. One of the plyometric-related
training methods that has received attention in recent years, is loaded or resistance (resistive) jump
training. Limited research does, however, exist with regard to the benefits and use of this training
method as well as in conjunction with other training methods, especially among team sport
participants. It is against this background that the research objectives of this study were firstly, to
examine the effects of a 4-week combined rugby-conditioning and resisted jump training program
compared to a combined rugby-conditioning and normal jump training program, on selected
physical, motor ability and anthropometric components of university-level rugby players. The
second objective was to examine the acute effects of a resisted compared to a normal jump training
session on selected physical and motor ability components of university-level rugby players.
Thirty rugby players (age: 19.60 ± 0.79 years) from the first and second u/19 and u/21 rugby teams
of a university in South Africa were randomly selected to participate in the first part of study. For
the second part of the study thirty senior rugby players (1st and 2nd senior teams) (age: 21.78 ± 1.86
years) of the Rugby Institute at a university in South Africa were randomly selected to participate
in the study. For both studies the thirty players were in turn randomly divided into two groups of
fifteen players each. One group formed the experimental and the other group the control group.
The first objective was tested by subjecting the players to a 4-week combined sport-specific and
resisted plyometric training program (experimental group) or a combined sport-specific and
normal plyometric training program to investigate the adaptations of body composition, lower
body flexibility, explosive leg power, speed, agility and leg strength. After a 10-week period
(“wash-out period”) during which subjects continued with their normal rugby-conditioning
program, the same testing procedures as before, were executed by following a crossover design. In
order to test the second objective of the study players’ body weight and height were firstly
measured after which they were subjected to a thorough warm-up, followed by the execution of
the flexibility;Vertical Jump Test (VJT); 5-, 10- and 20 m speed tests; the Illinois Agility Run Test
(IART) and the 6RM (repetition maximum) Smith Machine Squat Test (6RM-SMST). The
experimental group was subject to the resisted jump training session on the Vertimax whereas the
control group executed the same exercises on the floor. Directly after the training session each of the players again completed the test battery. After the first week, a crossover design was
implemented.
Although the overall study (independent t-test and main effect ANOVA) results of the first study
suggested that the experimental group experienced more positive changes, especially with regard
to the body fat, skeletal mass and somatotype-related anthropometric and flexibility-related
measurements, only relaxed upper-arm girth, ectomorphy, left Active-straight-leg-raise-test and
the left Modified Thomas Quadriceps Test values showed significant differences (p < 0.05) when
the two groups of players were compared. Although the experimental group demonstrated
significantly better average scores in the majority of the last-mentioned components, this group
experienced a significantly higher reduction in relaxed upper-arm girth due to the conditioning
program than the control group. The main effect ANOVA results of the acute study showed that no
significant differences were obtained for any of the measured components between an acute
resisted and normal jump training session.
To conclude, the study revealed that a 4-week combined rugby-conditioning and resisted jump
training program (experimental group) did not benefit university-level rugby players significantly
more with regard to selected physical, motor ability and anthropometric components than a
combined rugby-conditioning and normal jump training program (control group). Furthermore,
despite the fact that the acute resisted and normal jump training exercises met all the requirements
to produce post-activation potentiation, the study results showed that these exercise sessions did
not lead to any significant acute changes in the physical and motor ability components of
university-level rugby players. / MA (Sport Science), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:nwu/oai:dspace.nwu.ac.za:10394/10859 |
| Date | January 2013 |
| Creators | Oosthuizen, Jacobus Johannes |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds