EThekwini Electricity (EE) purchases its energy on the Megaflex tariff from Eskom which has had
considerable changes in content over the years. This has caused the present tariffs offered by EE to
move away from cost reflectivity. Structural changes over the years have caused distortion to even
the supposedly cost reflect ‘Time of Use’ tariff (TOU) which emulated Eskom’s previous Large
Power Users (LPU) tariffs. The divergence between the purchase of electricity and the method of
recovery for the sales becomes a cause for concern. This opens EE to risk of not being able to offer
cost reflective tariffs and diminish risks in recovery via the tariffs. This has an impact on the
budgeted revenue.
The primary intention of this study was to establish a formalised procedure and to develop a
methodology that Ethekwini Electricity (EE) can use for the review of their tariffs. This study was
necessary and extremely crucial for the mitigation of financial risk when tariffs are reviewed and
restructured since the revenue recovered via the tariffs are in excess of 5 billion rand per annum.
The study consisted of the development of a methodology which consists of a process flowchart
and a series of Excel spreadsheets in which the analysis was done. The development of the model
utilised information that were readily available and data that were extracted and manipulated from
installed systems. The objectives were to determine all associated costs for the delivery of
electricity, identify cost drivers, determine cost structure and finally determine applicable tariffs for
EE. Issues such as customer categorisation, cross subsidisation, cost reflectivity and affordability
were taken into account. This model could now be used in the future for tariff increases and
applications to the regulator.
This methodology was used to design of the 2009/2010 electricity tariffs for Ethekwini Electricity.
The outcome of this study resulted in the re-categorisation of EE’s customer base, changes to the
tariff structures and the phasing out of the non cost reflective tariffs. This study enabled the
restructure of the LPU TOU tariff which was crucial for EE’s cost recovery. It also resulted in the
development of two new TOU tariffs for residential and commercial customers. Whilst other
municipalities experienced difficulties in recovering their revenue due to Eskom’s restructured
Megaflex tariff, EE’s actual revenue differed by 1% when it was compared to the budgeted revenue
towards the end of 2009. / Thesis (M.Sc.Eng.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 2010.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/6883 |
| Date | January 2010 |
| Creators | Ramballee, Ashwin. |
| Contributors | Ijumba, Nelson M. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | en_ZA |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0172 seconds