This dissertation consists of four submission-ready papers that address some of the key error sources that
affect the accuracy of interpretation of nanoindentation test results to obtain material properties for elastoplastic
materials. The first part of the work is a study of the effect of sample tilt on results of nanoindentation tests.
Geometrical relations are used to develop a correction to account for the effect of tilt angle on the contact area. 3D
FEA (Finite Element Analysis) shows that the assumptions made in deriving the geometric correction are valid, and
the results for contact area, hardness and modulus match the predictions of the analytical model. It is shown that for
both materials that sink-in and those that pile-up, the projected contact area for nanoindentation on tilted sample is
higher than that estimated by the standard area function, which leads to overestimation of the hardness and elastic
modulus. Experimental nanoindentation tests on tilted samples show lower sensitivity to sample tilt compared to
FEA results because the compliance of the indenter holder causes the indenter tip to displace in the direction of the
surface tilt, reducing the total penetration of the tip into the surface. For tips with very high compliance, this may
even lead to significant underestimation of the hardness and modulus.
The second part discusses the various factors that affect the accuracy of FEA of nanoindentation. With the
understanding that contact area error arising from discretization of the continuum is a key contributor to noise in the
hardness data, a self similar mesh is designed that results in a known amount of maximum error in contact area over
a range of depths of penetration of the indenter. Based on the fact that contact area increases in discrete jumps, it is
argued that the maximum force that a given area of contact can support, before the next element comes into contact,
is the best measure of the true hardness of the material that can be obtained with a given mesh. FEA simulations
carried out with meshes of different amounts of error in contact area show that as the discretization becomes coarser,
the estimate of the true hardness increases, due to the inability of the mesh to resolve the steep gradients in stress
and strain near the end point of contact. It is also shown that results obtained from different meshes with different
error percentages can be extrapolated to determine the exact value of hardness that will be obtained with
infinitesimally small elements. It is shown that other sources of error, such as the convergence tolerance of the
iterative solution process, are small in comparison to the discretization errors.
The third part is a study aimed at identifying the size of the volume underneath a nanoindentation that
influences the hardness and modulus measured. FEA simulations of the indentation of a hemispherical particle
embedded in a matrix reveal that the hardness of particle can be measured accurately by nanoindentation as long as
vii
the plastically deformed region is confined entirely within the particle. While this may be intuitively obvious in
retrospect, this is the first quantitative demonstration that this is so. It is found that an available relationship between
the force, yield stress, and the radius of the plastically deformed zone is accurate under the conditions studied. This
can be used to determine the maximum penetration depth that can be used if the size of the particle is to be
estimated. For modulus of elasticity, it is shown that the modulus measured by nanoindentation method actually
represents the elastic response of the entire specimen at the indentation point, which for all penetration depths, is a
composite of the elastic response of both the particle and the matrix. A relationship is developed that shows the
effect of boundary conditions and the matrix on the modulus measured by indentation at low depths of penetration
for a hemispherical particle/matrix system.
The last part describes a new iterative procedure for estimation of the mechanical properties of elasticperfectly
plastic materials by nanoindentation. The key feature of this method is the estimation of the correct contact
height, irrespective of whether the material piles-up or sinks-in, using an iterative procedure. It is shown that the
proposed method improves the estimation of hardness and modulus compared to the Oliver and Pharr method and
also gives a good estimation of the yield stress for materials with plastic index greater than 10. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wichita State University, College of Engineering, Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:WICHITA/oai:soar.wichita.edu:10057/3283 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Kashani, Mahdi Saket |
| Contributors | Madhavan, Viswanathan |
| Publisher | Wichita State University |
| Source Sets | Wichita State University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Dissertation |
| Format | ix, 103 p., 5503072 bytes, 1843 bytes, application/pdf, text/plain |
| Rights | Copyright Mahdi Saket Kashani, 2010. All rights reserved |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds