This thesis aims to analyze problems of employee monitoring in constitutional frameworks as well as in terms of the most used types of employee monitoring. The goal is to point out that employee surveillance underwent a considerable evolution in last few years. To illustrate that considerable evolution, there is a comparison of Supreme courts of Czech Republic judgement from 2012 and European Court of Human Rights Grand chambers judgement from 2017. After a comparison of those two judgements there is a conclusion of the Supreme court's judgement from 2012 to analyze whether it is still up-to-date. This thesis is divided into six chapters. In the first chapter there is an analysis of constitutional frameworks and explanation which constitutional rights and freedoms should be took into consideration, compared with each other and what are reasons to do so. In the second chapter, there is an analysis of relevant Czech Republic law and EU regulation well known under abbreviation GDPR and there are also examples of relevant law usage on particular situations. In third chapter, there are concrete methods of employee monitoring. There is an analysis of CCTV systems with record and without record between which there is a huge difference in employer duties required by law. There is also analysis of employee...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:405404 |
| Date | January 2019 |
| Creators | Rýdl, Adam |
| Contributors | Štefko, Martin, Morávek, Jakub |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0034 seconds