Return to search

Reconfigura??es industriais das regi?es metropolitanas do Nordeste: uma an?lise a partir do emprego formal

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:34:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DaniloDB_DISSERT.pdf: 1277679 bytes, checksum: 442a118daf4b7d8574e53b1e5d0ae144 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-12-18 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / Industrial development experienced by Brazil from the 1950s, changed the
concentration of population in the country. The process of development of domestic
industry, concentrated in urban areas, crowded growing portion of the population.The
Southeast region during the first stage of industrialization driven by the state, with the
implementation of Plan goals, captained the major industrial projects implemented in
the period and became the main industrial center of the country.In the decade from 1960
to 1980 the state action was marked by numerous regional development projects,
softening the industrial concentration and Brazilian investment redirected to the
Northeast.The second National Development Plan implemented in the 1970s led to
major investments Northeast.This period marked the widespread urban growth and
institutionalization of the first metropolitan areas in Brazil.The change of this
developmental process is altered with the fiscal and financial crisis of the state in the
1980s and 1990s and spending cuts aimed at national development, reorienting the
economy to liberal policies of economic liberalization and reduction of activity in the
economy.Industrial policy was relegated to local development plans from the 1990s to
the federating units fitting the wide use of tax incentives, the "war tax" to the continued
industrialization process.In this context of the national economy work seeks to analyze
the industrial setting in the metropolitan areas of Fortaleza, Recife and Salvador
between 1995 and 2010.Although the metropolitan areas of Fortaleza, Recife and
Salvador are the main urban centers of the Northeast, responsible for the advancement
of industrial development, reconfigurations occurred between 1995 and 2010 by
changing the level of industrial specialization built by regional division of labor in these
regions.The work will be carried out by the method of descriptive analysis of the
literature review on regional and urban development.Constitute quantitative method as
the secondary data analysis of formal employment from the Annual Social Information
(RAIS) Ministry of Labour and Employment (MTE).Using data RAIS / MTE analyzes
the industrial specialization index using the Locational Quotient (LQ).Thus, it is
assumed as a parameter analysis QL> 1, when the region has become specialized in a
particular sector or QL <1, when the region does not have expertise in industrial sector
analyzed.The conclusion of study indicates that there was in these metropolitan areas
maintained the same bias hub.Fiscal policies, the states, was not successful in
diversifying the productive structure and the Northeast region itself.This result is
demonstrated by the need and dependence on state investments in the region to promote
development.Industrial policies of recent years have been positive to meet the objectives
of employment generation, but there must be specific policies for better diversification
of production, in addition to integrating the economy of the Northeast sector and
regionally / O desenvolvimento industrial vivenciado pelo Brasil, a partir da d?cada de 1950, alterou
a concentra??o populacional no territ?rio nacional. O processo de desenvolvimento da
ind?stria nacional, concentrado em n?cleos urbanos, aglomerou parcela crescente da
popula??o brasileira. A regi?o Sudeste durante a primeira etapa da industrializa??o
orientada pelo Estado, com a implanta??o do Plano de Metas, capitaneou os principais
projetos industriais implantados no per?odo e tornou-se o principal polo industrial do
pa?s. Na d?cada de 1960 a 1980 a atua??o do Estado esteve marcada por in?meros
projetos de desenvolvimento regional, amenizando a concentra??o industrial brasileira e
redirecionando investimento para a regi?o Nordeste. O segundo Plano Nacional de
Desenvolvimento implantado na d?cada de 1970 levou investimentos importantes ao
Nordeste. Este per?odo marcou o amplo crescimento urbano e a institucionaliza??o das
primeiras regi?es metropolitanas no Brasil. A mudan?a desse processo de
desenvolvimento sofre altera??es com a crise fiscal e financeira do Estado na d?cada de
1980 e 1990 e o corte de gastos direcionado ao desenvolvimento nacional, reorientando
a economia para pol?ticas liberais de abertura econ?mica e redu??o da atua??o do
Estado na economia. A pol?tica industrial ficou relegada aos planos de desenvolvimento
local a partir da d?cada de 1990 cabendo ?s unidades federativas a ampla utiliza??o de
incentivos fiscais, a chamada guerra fiscal , para a continua??o do processo
industrializante. Neste contexto da economia nacional, o trabalho busca analisar a
configura??o industrial nas regi?es metropolitanas de Fortaleza, Recife e Salvador entre
1995 e 2010. Embora as regi?es metropolitanas de Fortaleza, Recife e Salvador sejam
as principais aglomera??es urbanas do Nordeste, respons?veis pelo avan?o do
desenvolvimento industrial, ocorreram reconfigura??es entre 1995 e 2010 alterando o
n?vel de especializa??o industrial constru?do pela divis?o regional do trabalho nessas
regi?es. O trabalho realizar-se-? atrav?s do m?todo descritivo com an?lise de revis?o
bibliogr?fica acerca do desenvolvimento regional e urbano. Constituir? como m?todo
quantitativo a an?lise de dados secund?rios do emprego formal da Rela??o Anual de
Informa??o Social (RAIS) do Minist?rio do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE). Atrav?s dos
dados RAIS/MTE analisa-se o ?ndice de especializa??o industrial, utilizando o
Quociente Locacional (QL). Desta forma, assume-se como par?metro de an?liseo QL >
1, quando a regi?o apresenta-se especializada em determinado setor ou QL < 1, quando
a regi?o n?o apresenta especializa??o industrial no setor analisado. A conclus?o do
trabalho indica que houve nestas regi?es metropolitanas uma manuten??o do mesmo
vi?s concentrador. As pol?ticas fiscais, dos estados, n?o logrou ?xito em diversificar a
estrutura produtiva local e da pr?pria regi?o Nordeste. Este resultado evidencia-se, pela
necessidade e depend?ncia de investimentos do Estado na regi?o para promover o
desenvolvimento. As pol?ticas industriais dos ?ltimos anos foram positivas para
responder aos objetivos de gera??o de emprego, mas precisa haver pol?ticas espec?ficas
para uma melhor diversifica??o produtiva, al?m de integrar a economia do Nordeste
setorial e regionalmente

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/14100
Date18 December 2013
CreatorsBrand?o, Danilo Duarte
ContributorsCPF:71466312491, Oliveira, Alunilda Jan?ncio de, CPF:14202123468, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1194517192582177, Ara?jo, Denilson da Silva, CPF:00109557719, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5982551597921280, Pereira, William Eufr?sio Nunes
PublisherUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Economia, UFRN, BR, Economia Regional
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0047 seconds