Return to search

Design Flood Elevations Beyond Code Requirements and Current Best Practices

In the United States, nearly 9 million people, 3.0% of the population, live in areas subject to the 1% annual chance (100-yr) coastal flood hazard. New construction and substantial improvements in coastal high hazard areas require structures to be elevated above the design flood elevation (DFE), without the use of fill (Bellomo et al. 1999). Building code requirements for flood elevation are linked to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) insurance policies, and represent the minimum requirement for building elevation. Current elevation procedures are limited to the 100-year base flood elevation with minimal guidance beyond the 100-year elevation in many locations, which may be of interest to those designing critical facilities and buildings with a longer design life (e.g. institutional buildings). Additional code-plus resources exist to provide best available practices for practitioners; however, gaps still exist that may lead to lower design elevations than warranted for a particular risk level.
In an effort to provide guidance for practitioners, this thesis presents a methodology to address existing gaps in combination in the context of current best practices. A short case study to demonstrate the proposed methodology in comparison to code and best practices is provided. To provide guidance for longer return period flood events, this thesis uses stillwater elevations (SWEL) from flood insurance studies (FIS) to extrapolate flood elevations associated with longer return periods. FIS data are fit using the Huff-Angel and SRCC regression models, resulting in an equation to be used for extrapolating new flood elevations. The results of are evaluated using R2 values, differences in projected elevations and known elevations for the same return period, and normalized data for the 100-year SWELs. The result of this work is not intended to become integrated into current code or policy regulations in the United States, but rather to provide generalized guidance to aid practitioners in decision making by consolidating current code, best practices, and characteristics of the changing coastal environment.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-04022013-171109
Date11 April 2013
CreatorsBohn, Frank H
ContributorsRoider, Emerald, Donald, Adrian, Friedland, Carol
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04022013-171109/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds