Return to search

Ghosts of Chances for Redemption via Abjection in Wilson Harris?s Palace of the Peacock and Others

This thesis explores, in three works of literature, possibilities for redemption via abjection. Julia Kristeva?s semanalysis is the primary theoretical tool with which Aphra Behn?s Oroonoko (1688) is examined as a nascent work in Caribbean literature. Next, and central to this thesis, the Guyanese Wilson Harris?s The Palace of the Peacock (1960) is discussed within Kristevan context and within Caribbeanist literary critical context. Mariella, a central and fluid character in Palace, acts as a semiotic agent of destruction and of abjectly sublime redemption for Donne and his crew of river boatmen in pursuit of Other ethnically mixed peoples in Guyana?s interior. Donne?s moment of epiphany, wherein he comes to understand how inhumanely he has treated Others, is followed by his ?second? death and rebirth in a celestial palace (along with the rest of the crew), marking his and their transformation from abject slavers to abjectly sublime and redeemed beings. The semiotic linguistic characteristics of Palace are investigated: while written in the style of Magical Realism, Palace contains lexical and dialectal features stemming from African and Amerindian influences. Flannery O?Connor?s ?Revelation? (1965) is the final work examined. Via legacies of plantation slavery and ensuing discrimination against freed African-Americans, many works of Southern U.S. literature contain qualities of postcolonial literatures, particularly the element of abject Otherness. In ?Revelation? Mrs. Ruby Turpin?s ideas about abject Others are transformed, as she is transformed from an abject avatar of white Southern racism and classism, into an abjectly sublime person who receives a ?revelation? of her wrongs righted in a celestial march of all human beings. Her ?revelation? is markedly similar to Donne?s in Palace, both in what she sees and in the language employed to describe what is revealed to her. In Palace and in ?Revelation,? characters are redeemed by their limitations, by recognition of their abjections, and thus from these abject restrictions. Although Behn?s narrator aborts her encounter with an Other, she comes very close to actualizing abject sublimity as is evinced in a fractured and digressive narrative, indicative of the narrator?s conflicted psyche. At least she is conflicted about New World colonial enterprises and their institutions of brutal enslavement. Rather than abjure abject Otherness, perhaps readers?students of life and of literature?would embrace abjection, the eschewed Otherness within, as a critical agent for and means to the sublime.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:NCSU/oai:NCSU:etd-06272005-105309
Date27 June 2005
CreatorsPowell, Ethel Anne
ContributorsDeborah Wyrick, Michael Grimwood, John Morillo
PublisherNCSU
Source SetsNorth Carolina State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-06272005-105309/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.013 seconds