Thesis (MEd)--Stellenbosch University, 2015. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Classroom–based assessment, also referred to as continuous assessment
(CASS), is a formal and important part of the evaluation of South African learners.
The weight attached to CASS varies according to the levels of grades. More
importantly, it is only in Grade 12 that CASS marks of all the learning areas or
subjects are combined with external summative assessment marks for a decision
of awarding a National Senior Certificate.
Continuous assessment (CASS) is formative in nature. This implies that learners
receive feedback on their performance throughout the year. The feedback learners
receive ought to prepare them well for the external summative assessment. If
learners have been prepared well for the external summative assessment, we
would expect their marks to be consistent with their level of achievement in CASS.
However, according to the Department of Education (2003c), having witnessed the
first year of CASS implementation in 2001, both national and provincial
examination authorities realised that the implementation of CASS was problematic
in certain schools. In the analysis of the 2001 and 2002 Senior Certificate
examination results by the South African Certification Council (SAFCERT), huge
discrepancies were found in certain schools between the raw CASS marks and the
adjusted examination marks of the same learners in a number of subjects. The
SAFCERT reported that in 2001 a total of 10 182 examination centres supplied
CASS marks that were more than 20% above the adjusted examination marks. This document-based study examines the extent of the discrepancies between
learners’ CASS marks and the marks they obtained in external summative
assessment. It also tentatively suggests possible reasons for the discrepancies.
To this end, this study compares scores for CASS marks of English First
Additional Language (ENGFAL) to scores for the same learners in the external
summative assessment. The documents recording learners’ CASS marks come
from four schools in Ilembe District, KwaZulu-Natal.
Although my mini thesis focuses on the extent of the discrepancy, my analysis
also makes some initial suggestions of some possible reasons for the
discrepancies between CASS and external summative assessment marks. These
tentative reasons are a lack of teacher knowledge in administering CASS; large
classes; the demanding administrative load of teachers; an interest in passing as
many learners as possible; not wanting to create tension, especially within small,
close-knit communities; and in many cases, generally dysfunctional schools.
My main suggestions for addressing the problem of discrepancies include:
providing better in-service training for teachers in regard to their knowledge of
subject content and assessment practices; making available to teachers an item
bank with samples of assessment questions and tasks; encouraging teachers to
become active participants of professional teacher organisations; encouraging
greater parental participation in informal assessment; and by establishing
assessment committees in schools. In addition, the government could appoint
more teachers to reduce overcrowded schools and classrooms, fund the
establishment of functional libraries, promote and monitor English as a medium of
instruction from as early as the Intermediate Phase. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: ’n Ondersoek van die Teenstrydighede by Punte vir Deurlopende Evaluering en
Eksterne Summatiewe Assessering by Engels Eerste Addisionele Taal in Graad12
Deurlopende evaluering (DE) is ʼn formele en belangrike aspek by die evaluering
van Suid-Afrikaanse leerders. Die gewig wat aan DE toegeken word, varieer na
gelang van die vlakke van die onderskeie grade. Dit is belangrik om daarop te let
dat die DE-punte net in Graad 12 by al die leer areas of vakke gekombineer word
met eksterne summatiewe assesseringspunte om die toekenning van ʼn Nasionale
Senior Sertifikaat te bepaal.
Deurlopende evaluering (DE) is formatief van aard. Dit beteken dat leerders
gedurende die jaar deurlopend terugvoer ontvang oor hul prestasie. Die terugvoer
wat hulle ontvang, is veronderstel om leerders deeglik voor te berei vir die
eksterne summatiewe assessering. Indien leerders deeglik voorberei is vir die
eksterne summatiewe assessering, sou verwag kan word dat die punt wat hulle
behaal by die eksterne summatiewe assessering ooreenstem met die vlak van hul
prestasie by DE.
Volgens die Departement van Onderwys (2003c) is daar egter na die eerste jaar
van die implementering van DE in 2001 deur beide die nasionale en provinsiale
eksamenowerhede tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat die implementering van DE in
sommige skole probleme skep. By die analise van die 2001- en 2002-uitslae van
die Senior Sertifikaat eksamen deur SAFCERT is groot teenstrydighede by sommige skole opgemerk tussen die onverwerkte DE-punte en die aangepaste
eksamen punte van dieselfde leerders in ʼn aantal vakke. SAFCERT het verslag
gedoen dat ʼn totaal van 10 182 eksamen sentra in 2001DE-punte verskaf het wat
20% hoër was as die aangepaste eksamen punte.
Die doel van hierdie studie is om die omvang van die teenstrydigheid tussen die
punte wat leerders tydens DE behaal het en die punte wat hulle in eksterne
summatiewe assessering behaal het, te ondersoek. Die studie sal ook tentatiewe
voorstelle maak oor die redes vir die teenstrydigheid. Om dit te kan doen, sal ek
die DE-uitslae en die uitslae van die eksterne summatiewe assessering van
dieselfde leerders vir Engels Eerste Addisionele Taal vergelyk. Die leerders is
afkomstig van vier skole in die IIembe Distrik, KwaZulu-Natal.
Alhoewel my minitese op die omvang van die teenstrydigheid fokus, bied my
analise ‘n paar moontlike oorsake vir die afwyking tussen DE-punte en eksterne
summatiewe assessering aan. Dit kan tentatief toegeskryf word aan: ʼn gebrek aan
kennis by onderwysers oor die toepassing van DE, groot klasse, die veeleisende
administratiewe las op onderwysers, die strewe om soveel as moontlik leerders te
laat slaag om nie spanning veral in klein geslote gemeenskappe te veroorsaak nie
en oor die algemeen in baie gevalle bloot disfunksionele skole.
My belangrikste voorstelle om die probleem van teenstrydighede aan te spreek, is
om meer insette aan onderwysers te voorsien om sodoende hul kennis van
vakinhoud en assesseringspraktyke uit te brei, om ʼn item bank met voorbeelde
van assesseringsvrae en -take beskikbaar te maak, om onderwysers aan te
moedig om aktief deel te neem aan professionele onderwyser organisasies, en om groter ouerbetrokkenheid aan te moedig by informele assessering om
assesserings komitees in skole tot stand te bring. In aansluiting hierby moet die
regering meer onderwysers aanstel om die oorbevolking in skole aan te spreek,
die instel van funksionele biblioteke befonds en Engels as ʼn medium van onderrig
van so vroeg as die Intermediêre Fase bevorder en monitor.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:sun/oai:scholar.sun.ac.za:10019.1/96945 |
| Date | 04 1900 |
| Creators | Mncwango, Jabu Busisiwe |
| Contributors | Bak, Nelleke, Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Education. Dept. of Education Policy Studies. |
| Publisher | Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | en_ZA |
| Detected Language | Unknown |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | 138 pages |
| Rights | Stellenbosch University |
Page generated in 0.0034 seconds