Return to search

Samuel Beckett and the End(s) of Man: Writing at the Limits of Experience

Through a Blanchovian reading, this study situates Samuel Beckett's major novels as writings either grappling with problems toward or at the limits of experience. Beckett posits in 1936 the necessity for a "literature of the unword," a literature that for Maurice Blanchot is aligned to the liminal experience of the il y a—i.e., of Being in general, Being without beings. Heidegger points the way toward this "outside" as approachable through language, as that which language dissimulates through signification. However, in opposition to the Heideggerian experience of a cornucopiate enownment of beings between man and Being, Blanchot privileges the Levinasian experience of the il y a—of horror, dread, and exile coupled with witless fascination—which becomes for Blanchot, as well as for Beckett, a "human, all-too-human" ontological quest(ion): What does human consciousness (the writer's) and writing metamorphose into at the threshold of this "outside"? For Beckett, in approaching the undistinguished "there is," a consciousness remains, but barely, the subject-less writer ill seeing a world that is no longer a world, ill hearing a voice that cannot be heard, ill saying thoughts that cannot be thought. In terms of "the man who writes [who] is [. . .] no longer Samuel Beckett but the necessity which has displaced him" (Blanchot "Where Now? Who Now?"), the writer becomes merely the recorder of a streaming, demented, but acutely "analytical" language marking the perverse inhuman-human juncture of the eternal repetition of nothing. This study proposes that beginning with Watt, after Murphy's meditation upon the paradox of experiencing nothingness while simultaneously acknowledging it (playfully mirrored by the "omniscient" narrator's access to Murphy's hermetically enclosed mind), Beckett parodies Blanchot's situation of the writer: in Watt's cartooning of the schizoid nature of the dispossessed writer/witness; in Molloy's proffering a writerly, inhuman ideal and a human history toward that ideal; in Malone Dies' bringing to an end the "author"; and in The Unnamable's obtaining, although (and necessarily) failingly, the primal scene of a subject-less writer/writing, a "scene" of voiceless voices and "endgames" that resonates through Beckett's later novels, Texts for Nothing, How It Is and the Nohow On trilogy. / A Dissertation submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. / Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2003. / Date of Defense: April 7, 2003. / Limits of Experience, Possibilities of a / Includes bibliographical references. / S. E. Gontarski, Professor Directing Dissertation; William Cloonan, Outside Committee Member; Fred L. Standley, Committee Member; Karen Laughlin, Committee Member.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_169070
ContributorsWillits, Curt G. (authoraut), Gontarski, S. E. (professor directing dissertation), Cloonan, William (outside committee member), Standley, Fred L. (committee member), Laughlin, Karen (committee member), Department of English (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution)
PublisherFlorida State University
Source SetsFlorida State University
LanguageEnglish, English
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText, text
Format1 online resource, computer, application/pdf

Page generated in 0.0115 seconds