Return to search

Beckett and Romanticism

Beckett's aesthetic sensibility was essentially Romantic. His early work, steeped in irony though it is, remains fundamentally indebted to a vocabulary and a trove of themes that he inherited from a wide array of philosophers and poets writing as early as the seventeenth century, and he goes on in subsequent fiction and drama to develop his two core Romantic themes: the schism between subject and object and the indestructibility of the creative imagination. Beckett critiques the notion that the mechanical-mathematical paradigm of explanation, which necessarily leads to materialism or dualism, is an accurate description of reality. Materialism and dualism, for Beckett, are equally unsatisfactory. His preference, instead, is for the "clair-obscur," the liminal, the indeterminate, the incoherent--each of which runs throughout a number of Romanticisms that were formative in Beckett's own development, thus demonstrating the ultimate futility of classifying Modernist and Postmodernist literature as anything other than indeterminate Post-Romanticisms. In Imagination Dead Imagine and Company, Beckett begins to move away from the solipsistic world of All Strange Away toward a recognition of the external world and, most significantly, to imaginative possibilities that are never absent in Beckett's purgatorial world of movement, flux, and vitality. And in Ill Seen Ill Said and Worstward Ho, he demonstrates, through an unparalleled imaginative and linguistic agility, the dynamism of the artist and his material, thereby effecting what he had long ago referred to as the "ideal real": an "extra-temporal" experiential interplay or oscillation between subject and object, form and content, eye and mind, empiricism and imagination. / A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of English in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. / Fall Semester, 2005. / October 7, 2005. / German Romanticism, Coleridge, Keats, Eugene Jolas, Modernism, Postmodernism, Mystical Theology, Enlightenment / Includes bibliographical references. / S. E. Gontarski, Professor Directing Dissertation; Mark Pietralunga, Outside Committee Member; R.M. Berry, Committee Member; Hunt Hawkins, Committee Member.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_176411
ContributorsRodriguez, Michael Angelo (authoraut), Gontarski, S. E. (professor directing dissertation), Pietralunga, Mark (outside committee member), Berry, R.M. (committee member), Hawkins, Hunt (committee member), Department of English (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution)
PublisherFlorida State University, Florida State University
Source SetsFlorida State University
LanguageEnglish, English
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText, text
Format1 online resource, computer, application/pdf
RightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them.

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds