Near-surface contaminant isolation facilities are routinely used for the disposal of hazardous and radioactive waste. The objective of these facilities is to maintain the long-term isolation of the identified contaminants as well as to mitigate their associated hazards. Societys experience with modern isolation techniques is beginning to show that these facilities and associated management techniques do not always perform as expected.
This research investigated the potential failure of contaminant isolation facilities. Failure, in the context of this research refers to a contaminant isolation facilitys inability to maintain contaminant isolation. Errors were viewed as potential precursors to future failure as they are an indication that actions did not go according to the plan or that the plan itself was inadequate to achieve the objective.
This research used a multiple case study design to further investigate what barriers and controls are used for long-term contaminant isolation and how these controls are currently performing. Seven case study reports were developed as part of this research. The sites investigated included Anaconda, Burrell, Canonsburg, Love Canal, Maxey Flats, Rocky Mountain Arsenal, and Spring Valley. Each of these cases involved sites where persistent contaminants were isolated on-site in the shallow subsurface. A cross-case failure analysis was then performed. Fault trees were developed and are presented in this research to illustrate potential failure pathways for each of the contaminant isolation facility controls.
Individual controls were found to contain many single point errors. These controls can be described as non-robust in that one event could potentially lead to a control error. System failure was found to require the breach of an engineered barrier. For engineered barrier error to occur a prior institutional control error must occur. Institutional control error alone does not appear to lead to system failure. Institutional control error, however, could be viewed as precursors to potential system failure. The lack of information management, stakeholder awareness and adequate resources were found to be key initiating events potentially leading to system failure. These initiating events could lead to latent institutional control error, which are not fully realized until subsequent events occur.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-03302005-112839 |
| Date | 06 April 2005 |
| Creators | Kostelnik, Kevin Michael |
| Contributors | James H. Clarke, David Kosson, Mark Abkowitz, Mark Cohen, Michael Vandenbergh, Jerry Harbour |
| Publisher | VANDERBILT |
| Source Sets | Vanderbilt University Theses |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03302005-112839/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds