Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-20T19:18:35Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
HeryzanyaAlvesRamalho_DISSERT.pdf: 1795343 bytes, checksum: 8f08a3a27bc7b5e5a9cf73d6d9a04ebc (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-21T21:01:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
HeryzanyaAlvesRamalho_DISSERT.pdf: 1795343 bytes, checksum: 8f08a3a27bc7b5e5a9cf73d6d9a04ebc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-21T21:01:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
HeryzanyaAlvesRamalho_DISSERT.pdf: 1795343 bytes, checksum: 8f08a3a27bc7b5e5a9cf73d6d9a04ebc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-09 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / Este estudo qualiquantitativo se prop?e a analisar escolhas l?xico-gramaticais realizadas em 18 textos escritos do g?nero Discussion produzidos por nove alunos de um instituto de idiomas pertencente a uma universidade federal no nordeste do Brasil. Os textos foram gerados em uma turma de ingl?s n?vel IV e em uma turma de conversa??o em dois momentos no decorrer de 2015.2 e submetidos ? an?lise qualitativa por meio do sistema de transitividade proposto pela lingu?stica sist?mico-funcional (HALLIDAY, 1994; EGGINS, 2004; HALLIDAY; MATTHIESSEN, 2014). Na an?lise quantitativa, utilizou-se a ferramenta Wordsmith Tools 5.0 (SCOTT, 2010) para identificar e quantificar os processos e os participantes das ora??es. Os resultados mostram que os processos mais usados na turma de n?vel IV foram is/are, like e have enquanto os processos mais recorrentes na turma de conversa??o foram is/are, think e do. Na primeira turma, o processo like sugere que os alunos concebem os assuntos tratados como quest?es de prefer?ncia pessoal enquanto, na segunda turma, o processo think revela a interpreta??o dos temas como quest?es de cren?as pessoais. Quanto aos participantes nas ora??es, as maiores recorr?ncias da turma de n?vel IV foram people, weekend, I e we, enquanto we, waste, problem, garbage, you e women foram mais recorrentes na turma de conversa??o. O uso recorrente de I na primeira turma mostra a estrat?gia dos alunos de se revelarem como autores a fim de expressarem sua opini?o. Por outro lado, na segunda turma, o uso de you consiste numa estrat?gia para chamar a aten??o do leitor diretamente. Tais resultados mostram que a identifica??o e a an?lise dos participantes e dos processos nas ora??es por meio da transitividade s?o feedback ?til para os alunos, seja na reescrita ou na produ??o de novos textos. / This qualiquantitative study analyzes lexicogrammatical choices realized in 18 written texts from the Discussion genre produced by nine students of a language institute at a federal university in Northeastern Brazil. The texts were generated in a Level IV English class and in a conversation class in two moments in 2015.2 and submitted to a qualitative analysis by using the transitivity system proposed by systemic-functional linguistics (HALLIDAY, 1994; EGGINS, 2004; HALLIDAY; MATTHIESSEN, 2014). In the quantitative analysis, we used the Wordsmith Tools 5.0 (SCOTT, 2010) program to identify and quantify the processes and the participants of the clauses. The results show that the most frequent processes in the level IV class were is/are, like and have whereas the most frequent processes in the conversation class were is/are, think, and do. In the first class, the process like suggests that the students conceive the subjects in question as matters of personal preference while, in the second class, the process think reveals the interpretation of the themes as matters of personal beliefs. Regarding the participants in the clauses, the more frequent recurrences in the level IV class were people, weekend, I and we, while we, waste, problem, garbage, you and women were more recurrent in the conversation class. The recurrent use of I in the first class shows the strategy of the students in revealing themselves as authors to express their opinions. On the other hand, in the second class, the use of you consists of a strategy to call the reader?s attention directly. These results show that the identification and the analysis of participants and processes in the clauses by means of transitivity are useful feedback for the students when rewriting or producing new texts.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/22365 |
| Date | 09 December 2016 |
| Creators | Ramalho, Heryz?nya Alves |
| Contributors | 01461272424, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6919670149148157, Weissheimer, Janaina, 35316187091, http://lattes.cnpq.br/7345837860360864, Vian J?nior, Orlando, 07367936824, http://lattes.cnpq.br/5463585749303495, Cooper, Jennifer Sarah |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0031 seconds