Abstract
This study sought to understand the differences and similarities between social work practice and evidence-based practice (EBP). As evidence-based practice becomes popularized in areas of professional practice, challenges and tensions arise for social workers.
This qualitative research study asked social workers working in the hospital setting how they define and use evidence-based practice in their work, and about the tensions they experience in using EBP. The study revealed that social workers maintain their scope of practice in areas related to advocacy, the use of systems theory and the importance of the therapeutic relationship with clients in the helping process. The social workers in the study identified that social workers understood the value of scientific research and indicated that as a profession, social work practice can use research to influence areas for social change.
The participants in the study described that social work practice and evidence-based practice are distinct. Social work practice is intended to understand and respond to social problems, whereas EBP in mental health settings is designed to resolve more narrowly-defined problems of individual coping. The social workers recognized that the two practices could only really co-exist. However, they did note that social workers’ commitments to reinforce self-determination for clients have potentially important overlap with EBP’s attention to patient values and preferences. / Thesis / Master of Social Work (MSW)
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/24340 |
| Date | January 2019 |
| Creators | Frederiksen, Savinna |
| Contributors | Sinding, Christina, Social Work |
| Source Sets | McMaster University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds