Return to search

Reactions to Value Pricing by Different Suburban Population Groups

Value pricing strategies are beginning to be considered for future improvements
in suburban areas that currently do not experience significant congestion but are
expected to become congested in the future. This is a significant departure from
implementing these strategies in congested urban areas as is commonly done now.
Therefore, traveler reaction in these suburban areas is unknown. To plan and design
value pricing projects most effectively, it will be necessary to gain an understanding of
suburban travelers' potential reaction to value pricing.
Responses to a survey of travelers using the eastern and western segments of
Interstate 10 (I-10) outside of San Antonio were used to study differences in response to
value pricing by suburban population groups. These surveys collected information on
travelers' socioeconomic and trip characteristics as well as their attitudes towards value
pricing in the form of potential Express Toll Lanes (ETLS). Stated preference scenarios
presented to survey respondents were used to develop mode choice models. These
models were used to determine characteristics that may impact the decision to choose to
travel on the general purpose lanes (GPLs) or the ETLs.
This research suggests that the implementation of value pricing strategies on
suburban corridors may pose a challenge from a policy standpoint. The populations
using these corridors appear to be more varied in their responses toward value pricing
than populations using congested urban corridors. Overall, it was found that the
majority of travelers on I-10E and I-10W are not favorable to the implementation of
value pricing for the future expansion of these corridors. However, I-10W travelers
seem to be more willing to pay for travel time savings. This is likely due to the fact that
travelers on I-10W earn higher average incomes, are more likely to use I-10W on a
regular basis for commute purposes, and are more often exposed to some traffic
congestion. Conversely, travelers on I-10E are more likely to use I-10E less frequently
for non-commute trips, travel longer distances, and probably do not have an intuitive
sense of the value they would place on travel time savings since they do not regularly
experience congestion.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-05-7662
Date2010 May 1900
CreatorsLowery, John
ContributorsBurris, Mark W.
Source SetsTexas A and M University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typethesis, text
Formatapplication/pdf

Page generated in 0.008 seconds